COLB
Price
$26.38
Change
+$0.58 (+2.25%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.89B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HWC
Price
$56.91
Change
+$0.19 (+0.33%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.76B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COLB vs HWC

Header iconCOLB vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts COLB vs HWCBanner chart's image
Columbia Banking System
Price$26.38
Change+$0.58 (+2.25%)
Volume$65.24K
Capitalization7.89B
Hancock Whitney
Price$56.91
Change+$0.19 (+0.33%)
Volume$38.25K
Capitalization4.76B
COLB vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
COLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COLB vs. HWC commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COLB is a Hold and HWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (COLB: $25.80 vs. HWC: $56.87)
Brand notoriety: COLB and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COLB: 106% vs. HWC: 87%
Market capitalization -- COLB: $7.89B vs. HWC: $4.76B
COLB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.89B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COLB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • COLB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than COLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COLB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COLB is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

COLB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.09% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

COLB is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COLB($7.89B) has a higher market cap than HWC($4.76B). COLB has higher P/E ratio than HWC: COLB (11.67) vs HWC (10.21). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 6.427 vs. COLB (1.874). COLB has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. HWC (513M). HWC has less debt than COLB: HWC (849M) vs COLB (3.91B). COLB has higher revenues than HWC: COLB (1.99B) vs HWC (1.47B).
COLBHWCCOLB / HWC
Capitalization7.89B4.76B166%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.8746.42729%
P/E Ratio11.6710.21114%
Revenue1.99B1.47B135%
Total Cash2.06B513M402%
Total Debt3.91B849M460%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COLB vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
COLB
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1916
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9428
SMR RATING
1..100
1112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5570
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COLB's Valuation (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (30). This means that COLB’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for COLB (94). This means that HWC’s stock grew significantly faster than COLB’s over the last 12 months.

COLB's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (12). This means that COLB’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

COLB's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (57). This means that COLB’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

COLB's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (70). This means that COLB’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COLBHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CUSEX38.930.28
+0.72%
Capital Group US Equity
ESPAX35.33N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Small Cap Value A
DVSMX24.97N/A
N/A
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Investor
SCJIX8.15N/A
N/A
Steward Covered Call Income I
CNWCX90.55-0.10
-0.11%
American Funds New World 529C

COLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COLB has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COLB jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COLB
1D Price
Change %
COLB100%
+2.25%
FFBC - COLB
89%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
FNB - COLB
88%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
HWC - COLB
87%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
FHB - COLB
87%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
UMBF - COLB
87%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
More