COLB
Price
$20.77
Change
-$1.05 (-4.81%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.05B
20 days until earnings call
WF
Price
$31.64
Change
-$1.63 (-4.90%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.73B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COLB vs WF

Header iconCOLB vs WF Comparison
Open Charts COLB vs WFBanner chart's image
Columbia Banking System
Price$20.77
Change-$1.05 (-4.81%)
Volume$43.1K
Capitalization4.05B
Woori Financial Group
Price$31.64
Change-$1.63 (-4.90%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization7.73B
COLB vs WF Comparison Chart
Loading...
COLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COLB vs. WF commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COLB is a Hold and WF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (COLB: $21.82 vs. WF: $33.27)
Brand notoriety: COLB and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COLB: 207% vs. WF: 94%
Market capitalization -- COLB: $4.05B vs. WF: $7.73B
COLB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.05B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COLB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • COLB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than COLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COLB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COLB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COLB is a better buy in the short-term than WF.

Price Growth

COLB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -13.82% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

COLB is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

WF is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.77% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WF($7.73B) has a higher market cap than COLB($4.05B). COLB has higher P/E ratio than WF: COLB (10.60) vs WF (3.62). WF YTD gains are higher at: 6.464 vs. COLB (-18.110). WF has higher revenues than COLB: WF (11.84T) vs COLB (2B).
COLBWFCOLB / WF
Capitalization4.05B7.73B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.1106.464-280%
P/E Ratio10.603.62293%
Revenue2B11.84T0%
Total Cash2.4BN/A-
Total Debt4.51BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COLB vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
COLB
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
822
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10032
SMR RATING
1..100
101
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6532
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as COLB (33) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to COLB’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for COLB (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew significantly faster than COLB’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as COLB (10) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to COLB’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as COLB (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to COLB’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COLB (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew somewhat faster than COLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COLBWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GYLD12.78-0.14
-1.12%
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
SABA8.57-0.10
-1.15%
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II
EPHE25.04-0.52
-2.03%
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF
AVEM59.48-1.23
-2.03%
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
POCT38.00-1.17
-2.99%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buf ETF™ Oct

COLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COLB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COLB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COLB
1D Price
Change %
COLB100%
-13.14%
UBSI - COLB
88%
Closely correlated
-6.83%
FFBC - COLB
87%
Closely correlated
-8.84%
BANR - COLB
87%
Closely correlated
-8.41%
ABCB - COLB
87%
Closely correlated
-9.90%
HWC - COLB
86%
Closely correlated
-10.27%
More