COMP
Price
$8.03
Change
-$0.20 (-2.43%)
Updated
Sep 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.43B
35 days until earnings call
MQ
Price
$5.28
Change
-$0.12 (-2.22%)
Updated
Sep 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.4B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COMP vs MQ

Header iconCOMP vs MQ Comparison
Open Charts COMP vs MQBanner chart's image
Compass
Price$8.03
Change-$0.20 (-2.43%)
Volume$85.01K
Capitalization4.43B
Marqeta
Price$5.28
Change-$0.12 (-2.22%)
Volume$114.86K
Capitalization2.4B
COMP vs MQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COMP vs. MQ commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COMP is a Buy and MQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (COMP: $8.22 vs. MQ: $5.40)
Brand notoriety: COMP and MQ are both not notable
COMP represents the Real Estate Development, while MQ is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COMP: 129% vs. MQ: 64%
Market capitalization -- COMP: $4.43B vs. MQ: $2.4B
COMP [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $4.43B. MQ’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.8T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.36B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COMP is a better buy in the long-term than MQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COMP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COMP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COMP is a better buy in the short-term than MQ.

Price Growth

COMP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +3.79% price change this week, while MQ (@Computer Communications) price change was -5.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.94%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

COMP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.83% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

@Computer Communications (-1.75% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COMP($4.43B) has a higher market cap than MQ($2.4B). MQ (42.480) and COMP (40.513) have similar YTD gains . COMP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.5M vs. MQ (-85.47M). MQ has more cash in the bank: 822M vs. COMP (177M). MQ has less debt than COMP: MQ (14.5M) vs COMP (547M). COMP has higher revenues than MQ: COMP (6.29B) vs MQ (553M).
COMPMQCOMP / MQ
Capitalization4.43B2.4B184%
EBITDA46.5M-85.47M-54%
Gain YTD40.51342.48095%
P/E RatioN/A56.80-
Revenue6.29B553M1,137%
Total Cash177M822M22%
Total Debt547M14.5M3,772%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COMPMQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOLIX16.68N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Inst
JERNX12.32N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate N
MCVIX33.22N/A
N/A
MFS Mid Cap Value I
YAFIX20.86N/A
N/A
AMG Yacktman Focused I
LCFLX14.98N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C

COMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMP has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMP jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COMP
1D Price
Change %
COMP100%
+3.40%
COIN - COMP
62%
Loosely correlated
+6.85%
AFRM - COMP
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
U - COMP
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
CLSK - COMP
59%
Loosely correlated
+14.74%
TDOC - COMP
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More

MQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQ has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQ jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQ
1D Price
Change %
MQ100%
+0.75%
COIN - MQ
64%
Loosely correlated
+6.85%
CLSK - MQ
59%
Loosely correlated
+14.74%
COMP - MQ
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.40%
RIOT - MQ
50%
Loosely correlated
+11.81%
ALRM - MQ
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
More