COMP vs PAGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COMP is a Sell and PAGS is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- COMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PAGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COMP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COMP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PAGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
COMP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -5.67% price change this week, while PAGS (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.89%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
COMP is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
PAGS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (-2.78% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| COMP | PAGS | COMP / PAGS | |
| Capitalization | 1.75B | 4.57B | 38% |
| EBITDA | -216.4M | 6.49B | -3% |
| Gain YTD | 68.085 | -38.733 | -176% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 13.72 | - |
| Revenue | 4.89B | 8.89B | 55% |
| Total Cash | 167M | 3.05B | 5% |
| Total Debt | 534M | 193M | 277% |
PAGS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COMP | PAGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 76% |
COMP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMP has been closely correlated with RDFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COMP jumps, then RDFN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMP | 100% | -4.24% | ||
| RDFN - COMP | 66% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| MTTR - COMP | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| HOUS - COMP | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| OPEN - COMP | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.21% | ||
| EXPI - COMP | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
More | ||||
PAGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGS has been closely correlated with STNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGS jumps, then STNE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGS | 100% | -2.30% | ||
| STNE - PAGS | 75% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| COIN - PAGS | 53% Loosely correlated | +9.69% | ||
| CLSK - PAGS | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| SQ - PAGS | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| COMP - PAGS | 41% Loosely correlated | -4.24% | ||
More | ||||