Advertisement
CON vs EFAA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CON is a Hold and EFAA is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CON’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
| CON | EFAA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
Advertisement
EFAA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAA has been closely correlated with CON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFAA jumps, then CON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAA | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| CON - EFAA | 92% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| AGS - EFAA | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RAND - EFAA | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| FER - EFAA | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| BNR - EFAA | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.56% | ||
More | ||||