COOSF
Price
$8.56
Change
+$0.22 (+2.64%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
360.95M
CSNVF
Price
$21.04
Change
-$0.78 (-3.57%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

COOSF vs CSNVF

Header iconCOOSF vs CSNVF Comparison
Open Charts COOSF vs CSNVFBanner chart's image
Carbios SA
Price$8.56
Change+$0.22 (+2.64%)
Volume$200
Capitalization360.95M
Corbion
Price$21.04
Change-$0.78 (-3.57%)
Volume$605
Capitalization1.39B
COOSF vs CSNVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSNVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COOSF vs. CSNVF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COOSF is a Hold and CSNVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (COOSF: $8.56 vs. CSNVF: $21.04)
Brand notoriety: COOSF and CSNVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COOSF: 19% vs. CSNVF: 188%
Market capitalization -- COOSF: $360.95M vs. CSNVF: $1.39B
COOSF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $360.95M. CSNVF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $1.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COOSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCSNVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CSNVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSNVF is a better buy in the long-term than COOSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COOSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSNVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COOSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CSNVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSNVF is a better buy in the short-term than COOSF.

Price Growth

COOSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +4.68% price change this week, while CSNVF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.99% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSNVF($1.39B) has a higher market cap than COOSF($361M). COOSF YTD gains are higher at: 28.224 vs. CSNVF (-10.163). CSNVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 163M vs. COOSF (-10.53M). COOSF has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. CSNVF (73.7M). COOSF has less debt than CSNVF: COOSF (6.49M) vs CSNVF (684M). CSNVF has higher revenues than COOSF: CSNVF (1.24B) vs COOSF (1.38M).
COOSFCSNVFCOOSF / CSNVF
Capitalization361M1.39B26%
EBITDA-10.53M163M-6%
Gain YTD28.224-10.163-278%
P/E RatioN/A13.91-
Revenue1.38M1.24B0%
Total Cash101M73.7M137%
Total Debt6.49M684M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSNVF: Fundamental Ratings
CSNVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COOSFCSNVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSNVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QTELX12.030.05
+0.42%
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II I
AGRYX138.09N/A
N/A
AB Growth Advisor
TNVIX17.90N/A
N/A
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value I
PFRSX28.67N/A
N/A
Principal Real Estate Securities Fd R6
BILSX9.93N/A
N/A
BlackRock U.S. Insights Lon/Shr Eq Ins

COOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COOSF and ZEOOY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COOSF and ZEOOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COOSF
1D Price
Change %
COOSF100%
+2.67%
ZEOOY - COOSF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GURE - COOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
COVTY - COOSF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
CSNVY - COOSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSNVF - COOSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CSNVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSNVF and ARKAF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSNVF and ARKAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSNVF
1D Price
Change %
CSNVF100%
N/A
ARKAF - CSNVF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADKIL - CSNVF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRLCF - CSNVF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSNVY - CSNVF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EESE - CSNVF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
More