COOSF
Price
$9.39
Change
+$0.45 (+5.03%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
360.95M
EESE
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
385.94K
Interact to see
Advertisement

COOSF vs EESE

Header iconCOOSF vs EESE Comparison
Open Charts COOSF vs EESEBanner chart's image
Carbios SA
Price$9.39
Change+$0.45 (+5.03%)
Volume$300
Capitalization360.95M
Energy & Environmental Services
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization385.94K
COOSF vs EESE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COOSF vs. EESE commentary
Jun 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COOSF is a Hold and EESE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2025
Stock price -- (COOSF: $9.39 vs. EESE: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: COOSF and EESE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COOSF: 27% vs. EESE: 0%
Market capitalization -- COOSF: $360.95M vs. EESE: $385.94K
COOSF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $360.95M. EESE’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $385.94K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COOSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEESE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EESE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EESE is a better buy in the long-term than COOSF.

Price Growth

COOSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EESE (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.35% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COOSF($361M) has a higher market cap than EESE($386K). COOSF YTD gains are higher at: 40.611 vs. EESE (-19.692). EESE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.65M vs. COOSF (-10.53M). COOSF has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. EESE (58.9K). EESE has less debt than COOSF: EESE (4.44K) vs COOSF (6.49M). COOSF has higher revenues than EESE: COOSF (1.38M) vs EESE (214K).
COOSFEESECOOSF / EESE
Capitalization361M386K93,523%
EBITDA-10.53M-1.65M637%
Gain YTD40.611-19.692-206%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.38M214K643%
Total Cash101M58.9K171,477%
Total Debt6.49M4.44K146,071%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EESE: Fundamental Ratings
EESE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
7
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VPADX99.56N/A
N/A
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Admiral
PKSCX35.82N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core C
RGCEX16.05N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Global Equity C
LLGLX13.95N/A
N/A
Longleaf Partners Global
QMGAX12.37N/A
N/A
Invesco Advantage International A

COOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COOSF and ZEOOY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COOSF and ZEOOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COOSF
1D Price
Change %
COOSF100%
N/A
ZEOOY - COOSF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GURE - COOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
COVTY - COOSF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
CSNVY - COOSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSNVF - COOSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EESE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EESE and COVTY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EESE and COVTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EESE
1D Price
Change %
EESE100%
N/A
COVTY - EESE
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
CSNVF - EESE
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTPKF - EESE
6%
Poorly correlated
+36.36%
COOSF - EESE
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSNVY - EESE
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More