COPAF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.72M
LCGMF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
35.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPAF vs LCGMF

Header iconCOPAF vs LCGMF Comparison
Open Charts COPAF vs LCGMFBanner chart's image
CopAur Minerals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$103.77K
Capitalization5.72M
LION COPPER & GOLD
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$803.52K
Capitalization35.83M
COPAF vs LCGMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LCGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COPAF vs. LCGMF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPAF is a Hold and LCGMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (COPAF: $0.06 vs. LCGMF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: COPAF and LCGMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COPAF: 391% vs. LCGMF: 639%
Market capitalization -- COPAF: $5.72M vs. LCGMF: $35.83M
COPAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.72M. LCGMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $35.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COPAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLCGMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COPAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LCGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COPAF is a better buy in the long-term than LCGMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COPAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LCGMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COPAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LCGMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LCGMF is a better buy in the short-term than COPAF.

Price Growth

COPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.40% price change this week, while LCGMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LCGMF($35.8M) has a higher market cap than COPAF($5.72M). LCGMF YTD gains are higher at: 65.602 vs. COPAF (-19.592). COPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.93M vs. LCGMF (-4.99M). LCGMF has more cash in the bank: 3.56M vs. COPAF (569K). LCGMF has less debt than COPAF: LCGMF (698K) vs COPAF (1M). COPAF (0) and LCGMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
COPAFLCGMFCOPAF / LCGMF
Capitalization5.72M35.8M16%
EBITDA-2.93M-4.99M59%
Gain YTD-19.59265.602-30%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash569K3.56M16%
Total Debt1M698K143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COPAF vs LCGMF: Fundamental Ratings
COPAF
LCGMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6489
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10093
SMR RATING
1..100
9499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COPAF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LCGMF (67). This means that COPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LCGMF’s over the last 12 months.

LCGMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as COPAF (100). This means that LCGMF’s stock grew similarly to COPAF’s over the last 12 months.

COPAF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as LCGMF (99). This means that COPAF’s stock grew similarly to LCGMF’s over the last 12 months.

LCGMF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COPAF (89). This means that LCGMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than COPAF’s over the last 12 months.

LCGMF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as COPAF (100). This means that LCGMF’s stock grew similarly to COPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPAFLCGMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LCGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GETY1.860.06
+3.33%
Getty Images Holdings
VAL51.110.85
+1.69%
Valaris Limited
KEQU53.73-0.38
-0.70%
Kewaunee Scientific Corp
FGNX9.63-0.64
-6.23%
Fundamental Global Inc
IBKR60.16-4.12
-6.41%
Interactive Brokers Group Inc

COPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COPAF and FMCXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COPAF and FMCXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPAF
1D Price
Change %
COPAF100%
+2.21%
FMCXF - COPAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
SOUHY - COPAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
MP - COPAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
PLL - COPAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LAC - COPAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
More

LCGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCGMF and NDMCF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCGMF and NDMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCGMF
1D Price
Change %
LCGMF100%
-0.49%
NDMCF - LCGMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COPAF - LCGMF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
GRLRF - LCGMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
ARAAF - LCGMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
LITM - LCGMF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
More