COPAF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
20.73M
MMILF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
66.87M
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPAF vs MMILF

Header iconCOPAF vs MMILF Comparison
Open Charts COPAF vs MMILFBanner chart's image
CopAur Minerals
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25.09K
Capitalization20.73M
Metro Mining
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization66.87M
COPAF vs MMILF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COPAF vs. MMILF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPAF is a Hold and MMILF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (COPAF: $0.09 vs. MMILF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: COPAF and MMILF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COPAF: 114% vs. MMILF: 311%
Market capitalization -- COPAF: $20.73M vs. MMILF: $66.87M
COPAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $20.73M. MMILF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $66.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COPAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMMILF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COPAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MMILF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COPAF is a better buy in the long-term than MMILF.

Price Growth

COPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +13.73% price change this week, while MMILF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.21% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMILF($66.9M) has a higher market cap than COPAF($20.7M). MMILF YTD gains are higher at: 18.681 vs. COPAF (9.159). COPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -938.5K vs. MMILF (-29.32M). MMILF has more cash in the bank: 13.9M vs. COPAF (354K). MMILF has higher revenues than COPAF: MMILF (192M) vs COPAF (0).
COPAFMMILFCOPAF / MMILF
Capitalization20.7M66.9M31%
EBITDA-938.5K-29.32M3%
Gain YTD9.15918.68149%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0192M-
Total Cash354K13.9M3%
Total DebtN/A67.4M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COPAF: Fundamental Ratings
COPAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHJ24.56-0.05
-0.20%
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
CCOR27.25-0.09
-0.32%
Core Alternative Capital
BSL14.13-0.05
-0.35%
Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund
RYLG20.16-0.50
-2.41%
Global X Russell 2000 Cov Cl & Gr ETF
FHLC62.21-1.56
-2.45%
Fidelity MSCI Health Care ETF

COPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COPAF and FMCXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COPAF and FMCXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPAF
1D Price
Change %
COPAF100%
-2.47%
FMCXF - COPAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
SOUHY - COPAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
NGLOY - COPAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
MP - COPAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.52%
IE - COPAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
More

MMILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMILF and VDOMF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMILF and VDOMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMILF
1D Price
Change %
MMILF100%
N/A
VDOMF - MMILF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COPAF - MMILF
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
DETRF - MMILF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
METOF - MMILF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
ARRNF - MMILF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
More