COPAF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.73M
MP
Price
$22.00
Change
+$1.50 (+7.32%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPAF vs MP

Header iconCOPAF vs MP Comparison
Open Charts COPAF vs MPBanner chart's image
CopAur Minerals
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization20.73M
MP Materials
Price$22.00
Change+$1.50 (+7.32%)
Volume$8.32M
Capitalization2.37B
COPAF vs MP Comparison Chart
Loading...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COPAF vs. MP commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPAF is a Hold and MP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (COPAF: $0.10 vs. MP: $22.00)
Brand notoriety: COPAF and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COPAF: 44% vs. MP: 113%
Market capitalization -- COPAF: $20.73M vs. MP: $2.37B
COPAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $20.73M. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COPAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COPAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COPAF is a better buy in the long-term than MP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

COPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +20.74% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +17.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.24% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($2.37B) has a higher market cap than COPAF($20.7M). MP YTD gains are higher at: 41.026 vs. COPAF (23.764). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94M vs. COPAF (-938.5K). MP has more cash in the bank: 998M vs. COPAF (354K). MP has higher revenues than COPAF: MP (253M) vs COPAF (0).
COPAFMPCOPAF / MP
Capitalization20.7M2.37B1%
EBITDA-938.5K94M-1%
Gain YTD23.76441.02658%
P/E RatioN/A107.71-
Revenue0253M-
Total Cash354K998M0%
Total DebtN/A689M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COPAF: Fundamental Ratings
COPAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGSIX29.72N/A
N/A
Vanguard Real Estate Index Investor
SBHAX19.31N/A
N/A
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
NINLX19.72N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value I
VRREX18.88N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Secs R6
SMISX29.64N/A
N/A
Invesco Summit R6

COPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COPAF and FMCXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COPAF and FMCXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPAF
1D Price
Change %
COPAF100%
+9.72%
FMCXF - COPAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
SOUHY - COPAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
MP - COPAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.32%
IE - COPAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
PLL - COPAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
More

MP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MP
1D Price
Change %
MP100%
+7.32%
LAR - MP
47%
Loosely correlated
+7.43%
LAC - MP
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
LYSDY - MP
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
SCCO - MP
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
SGML - MP
44%
Loosely correlated
+7.97%
More