COPAF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.73M
PLL
Price
$6.52
Change
-$0.10 (-1.51%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
256.53M
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPAF vs PLL

Header iconCOPAF vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts COPAF vs PLLBanner chart's image
CopAur Minerals
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$60.13K
Capitalization20.73M
Piedmont Lithium
Price$6.52
Change-$0.10 (-1.51%)
Volume$181.8K
Capitalization256.53M
COPAF vs PLL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COPAF vs. PLL commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPAF is a StrongBuy and PLL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (COPAF: $0.08 vs. PLL: $6.52)
Brand notoriety: COPAF and PLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COPAF: 149% vs. PLL: 80%
Market capitalization -- COPAF: $20.73M vs. PLL: $256.53M
COPAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $20.73M. PLL’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $256.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COPAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COPAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both COPAF and PLL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COPAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COPAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLL is a better buy in the short-term than COPAF.

Price Growth

COPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.10% price change this week, while PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +10.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLL($257M) has a higher market cap than COPAF($20.7M). COPAF YTD gains are higher at: -1.506 vs. PLL (-25.400). COPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -938.5K vs. PLL (-18.36M). PLL has more cash in the bank: 72.2M vs. COPAF (354K). PLL has higher revenues than COPAF: PLL (39.8M) vs COPAF (0).
COPAFPLLCOPAF / PLL
Capitalization20.7M257M8%
EBITDA-938.5K-18.36M5%
Gain YTD-1.506-25.4006%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue039.8M-
Total Cash354K72.2M0%
Total DebtN/A1.57M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COPAF vs PLL: Fundamental Ratings
COPAF
PLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
294
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COPAF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (27) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that COPAF’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

COPAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that COPAF’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

COPAF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (94) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that COPAF’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as COPAF (64) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to COPAF’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as COPAF (100) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to COPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPAFPLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSHRF0.290.01
+2.24%
Goldshore Resources Inc.
SIUDF0.04N/A
N/A
Shanghai Industrial Urban Development Group Ltd.
MOHCF23.00N/A
N/A
Motor Oil (Hellas) Corinth Refineries S.A.
GOGY0.02N/A
N/A
Golden Grail Technology Corp
SLVYY3.41-0.07
-2.15%
Solvay S.A.

COPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COPAF and FMCXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COPAF and FMCXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPAF
1D Price
Change %
COPAF100%
+3.02%
FMCXF - COPAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
SOUHY - COPAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
MP - COPAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
IE - COPAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
PLL - COPAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
More

PLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLL
1D Price
Change %
PLL100%
-1.51%
LAR - PLL
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
LAC - PLL
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
FSUGY - PLL
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
SGML - PLL
47%
Loosely correlated
+7.90%
GLNCY - PLL
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More