COSO
Price
$21.48
Change
+$0.19 (+0.89%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
257.31M
59 days until earnings call
CTYP
Price
$6.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

COSO vs CTYP

Header iconCOSO vs CTYP Comparison
Open Charts COSO vs CTYPBanner chart's image
CoastalSouth Bancshares
Price$21.48
Change+$0.19 (+0.89%)
Volume$32.98K
Capitalization257.31M
Community Bankers (PA)
Price$6.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization13.89M
COSO vs CTYP Comparison Chart in %
COSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COSO vs. CTYP commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSO is a Buy and CTYP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (COSO: $21.48 vs. CTYP: $6.15)
Brand notoriety: COSO and CTYP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COSO: 72% vs. CTYP: 20%
Market capitalization -- COSO: $257.31M vs. CTYP: $13.89M
COSO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $257.31M. CTYP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COSO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCTYP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COSO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CTYP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTYP is a better buy in the long-term than COSO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COSO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTYP’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COSO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CTYP’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COSO is a better buy in the short-term than CTYP.

Price Growth

COSO (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.73% price change this week, while CTYP (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

COSO is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COSO($257M) has a higher market cap than CTYP($13.9M). COSO has higher P/E ratio than CTYP: COSO (9.26) vs CTYP (8.42). CTYP YTD gains are higher at: 16.423 vs. COSO (-2.101). COSO has less debt than CTYP: COSO (14.8M) vs CTYP (21.1M). COSO has higher revenues than CTYP: COSO (70.5M) vs CTYP (12.2M).
COSOCTYPCOSO / CTYP
Capitalization257M13.9M1,849%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.10116.423-13%
P/E Ratio9.268.42110%
Revenue70.5M12.2M578%
Total Cash21.4MN/A-
Total Debt14.8M21.1M70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COSO vs CTYP: Fundamental Ratings
COSO
CTYP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42100
SMR RATING
1..100
4768
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
578
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTYP's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as COSO (51). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

COSO's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTYP (100). This means that COSO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

COSO's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CTYP (68). This means that COSO’s stock grew similarly to CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as COSO (57). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COSO (57). This means that CTYP’s stock grew somewhat faster than COSO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSOCTYP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
45%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LILIF0.06N/A
+0.12%
Argentina Lithium & Energy Corp
ROHCF15.00N/A
N/A
Rohm Co. Ltd.
JPAVF17.18N/A
N/A
Japan Aviation Electronics Ltd.
FDVA11.64N/A
N/A
FREEDOM FINL HLDGS INC.
FNCTF15.56N/A
N/A
Orange

COSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COSO has been loosely correlated with AMBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COSO jumps, then AMBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COSO
1D Price
Change %
COSO100%
+0.89%
AMBK - COSO
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTYP - COSO
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HONE - COSO
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
FMFG - COSO
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFSCP - COSO
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CTYP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTYP and MCHT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTYP and MCHT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTYP
1D Price
Change %
CTYP100%
N/A
MCHT - CTYP
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSO - CTYP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
DNSKF - CTYP
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NACB - CTYP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSGB - CTYP
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More