COST
Price
$1049.33
Change
+$8.08 (+0.78%)
Updated
May 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
461.95B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DG
Price
$105.05
Change
+$3.30 (+3.24%)
Updated
May 14 closing price
Capitalization
23.13B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COST vs DG

Header iconCOST vs DG Comparison
Open Charts COST vs DGBanner chart's image
COST vs DG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COST vs. DG commentary
May 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a Hold and DG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 15, 2026
Stock price -- (COST: $1041.25 vs. DG: $105.05)
Brand notoriety: COST and DG are both notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 91% vs. DG: 110%
Market capitalization -- COST: $461.95B vs. DG: $23.13B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $461.95B. DG’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $23.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $1.06T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $120.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileDG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • DG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the long-term than DG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than DG.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а +2.88% price change this week, while DG (@Discount Stores) price change was -9.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

DG is expected to report earnings on Jun 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (-2.23% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COST($462B) has a higher market cap than DG($23.1B). COST has higher P/E ratio than DG: COST (54.15) vs DG (15.34). COST YTD gains are higher at: 21.087 vs. DG (-20.164). COST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.1B vs. DG (3.24B). COST has more cash in the bank: 18.2B vs. DG (1.14B). COST has less debt than DG: COST (8.17B) vs DG (15.7B). COST has higher revenues than DG: COST (286B) vs DG (42.7B).
COSTDGCOST / DG
Capitalization462B23.1B2,000%
EBITDA14.1B3.24B435%
Gain YTD21.087-20.164-105%
P/E Ratio54.1515.34353%
Revenue286B42.7B670%
Total Cash18.2B1.14B1,598%
Total Debt8.17B15.7B52%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs DG: Fundamental Ratings
COST
DG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1756
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
3347
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5868
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DG's Valuation (34) in the Discount Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COST (94) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that DG’s stock grew somewhat faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for DG (100) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew significantly faster than DG’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (33) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as DG (47) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to DG’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as DG (63) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to DG’s over the last 12 months.

COST's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as DG (68) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to DG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTDG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELCV31.260.28
+0.90%
Eventide High Dividend ETF
FFGX34.09N/A
+0.01%
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
IYH61.67-0.06
-0.10%
iShares US Healthcare ETF
MSOX3.35-0.05
-1.47%
AdvisorShares MSOS Daily Leveraged ETF
DFEN65.79-1.24
-1.85%
Direxion Dly Aerospace&Def Bl 3X ShsETF

COST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COST
1D Price
Change %
COST100%
+0.79%
WMT - COST
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
BJ - COST
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
PSMT - COST
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
TGT - COST
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
DLMAF - COST
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More

DG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DG has been loosely correlated with DLTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DG jumps, then DLTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DG
1D Price
Change %
DG100%
+3.24%
DLTR - DG
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.65%
TGT - DG
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
WMT - DG
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
BJ - DG
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
PSMT - DG
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More