COST
Price
$721.86
Change
-$2.03 (-0.28%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
34 days until earnings call
DG
Price
$142.13
Change
-$0.46 (-0.32%)
Updated
Apr 26, 12:09 PM EST
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COST vs DG ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconCOST vs DG Comparison
Open Charts COST vs DGBanner chart's image
Costco Wholesale
Price$721.86
Change-$2.03 (-0.28%)
Volume$625.32K
CapitalizationN/A
Dollar General
Price$142.13
Change-$0.46 (-0.32%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
COST vs DG Comparison Chart

Loading...

COSTDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
DGDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
COST vs. DG commentary
Apr 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a Hold and DG is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2024
Stock price -- (COST: $721.86 vs. DG: $142.65)
Brand notoriety: COST and DG are both notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 78% vs. DG: 59%
Market capitalization -- COST: $320.15B vs. DG: $31.34B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $320.15B. DG’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $31.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $485.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $67.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileDG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • DG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the long-term than DG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than DG.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while DG (@Discount Stores) price change was -2.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on May 30, 2024.

DG is expected to report earnings on May 30, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (+1.03% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for COST with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for DG with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COST($320B) has a higher market cap than DG($31.3B). COST has higher P/E ratio than DG: COST (47.24) vs DG (18.89). COST YTD gains are higher at: 9.520 vs. DG (5.386).
COSTDGCOST / DG
Capitalization320B31.3B1,022%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.5205.386177%
P/E Ratio47.2418.89250%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A18.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs DG: Fundamental Ratings
COST
DG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6562
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
773
SMR RATING
1..100
3238
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3167
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DG's Valuation (65) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as COST (93) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that DG’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for DG (73) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew significantly faster than DG’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (32) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as DG (38) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to DG’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as DG (57) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to DG’s over the last 12 months.

COST's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DG (67) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew somewhat faster than DG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTDG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COSTDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
DGDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERJ25.000.54
+2.21%
Embraer SA
YHGJ1.380.02
+1.84%
Yunhong Green CTI Ltd
KMB136.43-1.35
-0.98%
Kimberly-Clark Corp
MFA10.54-0.15
-1.40%
MFA Financial
SPIR9.74-0.46
-4.51%
Spire Global

COST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COST
1D Price
Change %
COST100%
-0.28%
WMT - COST
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
BJ - COST
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
DLTR - COST
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
PSMT - COST
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
TGT - COST
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
More