COST vs DLMAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a Hold and DLMAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COST’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileDLMAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- COST’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- DLMAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- COST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а -3.44% price change this week, while DLMAF (@Discount Stores) price change was +1.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -6.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
COST is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Discount Stores (-6.94% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
| COST | DLMAF | COST / DLMAF | |
| Capitalization | 459B | 28.2B | 1,628% |
| EBITDA | 12.4B | 2.04B | 609% |
| Gain YTD | 13.086 | 4.550 | 288% |
| P/E Ratio | 60.81 | 36.65 | 166% |
| Revenue | 259B | 6.17B | 4,197% |
| Total Cash | 11.8B | 283M | 4,170% |
| Total Debt | 8.03B | 4.66B | 173% |
COST | DLMAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DLMAF's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as COST (96) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that DLMAF’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.
DLMAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as COST (3) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that DLMAF’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.
DLMAF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as COST (32) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that DLMAF’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.
COST's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DLMAF (48) in the null industry. This means that COST’s stock grew somewhat faster than DLMAF’s over the last 12 months.
COST's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as DLMAF (34) in the null industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to DLMAF’s over the last 12 months.
| COST | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 38% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% |
DLMAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DLMAF and OLLI have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLMAF and OLLI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DLMAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLMAF | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| OLLI - DLMAF | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.59% | ||
| COST - DLMAF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
| WMT - DLMAF | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
| BMRRY - DLMAF | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| WMMVY - DLMAF | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||