COST
Price
$972.21
Change
+$3.65 (+0.38%)
Updated
Aug 7, 01:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
429.53B
49 days until earnings call
WMMVF
Price
$2.86
Change
+$0.02 (+0.70%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
50.02B
Interact to see
Advertisement

COST vs WMMVF

Header iconCOST vs WMMVF Comparison
Open Charts COST vs WMMVFBanner chart's image
Costco Wholesale
Price$972.21
Change+$3.65 (+0.38%)
Volume$840
Capitalization429.53B
Wal-Mart De Mexico S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.70%)
Volume$12.29K
Capitalization50.02B
COST vs WMMVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COST vs. WMMVF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a StrongBuy and WMMVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (COST: $968.56 vs. WMMVF: $2.86)
Brand notoriety: COST: Notable vs. WMMVF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 132% vs. WMMVF: 35%
Market capitalization -- COST: $429.53B vs. WMMVF: $50.02B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $429.53B. WMMVF’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $50.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $824.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $103.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWMMVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WMMVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the long-term than WMMVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMMVF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WMMVF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than WMMVF.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а +4.57% price change this week, while WMMVF (@Discount Stores) price change was -6.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Sep 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (+2.25% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COST($430B) has a higher market cap than WMMVF($50B). COST has higher P/E ratio than WMMVF: COST (54.94) vs WMMVF (18.22). WMMVF YTD gains are higher at: 10.000 vs. COST (6.108). WMMVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 99.6B vs. COST (12.9B). WMMVF has more cash in the bank: 32.4B vs. COST (14.8B). COST has less debt than WMMVF: COST (8.18B) vs WMMVF (78.8B). WMMVF has higher revenues than COST: WMMVF (991B) vs COST (269B).
COSTWMMVFCOST / WMMVF
Capitalization430B50B860%
EBITDA12.9B99.6B13%
Gain YTD6.10810.00061%
P/E Ratio54.9418.22302%
Revenue269B991B27%
Total Cash14.8B32.4B46%
Total Debt8.18B78.8B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs WMMVF: Fundamental Ratings
COST
WMMVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
678
SMR RATING
1..100
3038
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4166
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WMMVF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COST (95) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WMMVF’s stock grew significantly faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for WMMVF (78) in the null industry. This means that COST’s stock grew significantly faster than WMMVF’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMMVF (38) in the null industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMMVF’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMMVF (63) in the null industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMMVF’s over the last 12 months.

COST's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMMVF (66) in the null industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMMVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTWMMVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WMMVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOCO6.310.40
+6.77%
GoHealth
TXO15.050.05
+0.33%
TXO Partners LP
IDCC270.250.65
+0.24%
InterDigital
RIME2.55-0.03
-1.16%
Algorhythm Holdings Inc
OVV39.54-0.58
-1.45%
Ovintiv

WMMVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMMVF has been loosely correlated with WMMVY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WMMVF jumps, then WMMVY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMMVF
1D Price
Change %
WMMVF100%
+0.70%
WMMVY - WMMVF
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
BMRPF - WMMVF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
COST - WMMVF
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
OLLI - WMMVF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
BMRRY - WMMVF
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
More