COST
Price
$944.96
Change
-$4.56 (-0.48%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
419.07B
27 days until earnings call
WMMVF
Price
$2.85
Change
-$0.14 (-4.68%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
51.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

COST vs WMMVF

Header iconCOST vs WMMVF Comparison
Open Charts COST vs WMMVFBanner chart's image
Costco Wholesale
Price$944.96
Change-$4.56 (-0.48%)
Volume$2.07M
Capitalization419.07B
Wal-Mart De Mexico S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.85
Change-$0.14 (-4.68%)
Volume$6.27K
Capitalization51.88B
COST vs WMMVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COST vs. WMMVF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a Buy and WMMVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (COST: $944.96 vs. WMMVF: $2.85)
Brand notoriety: COST: Notable vs. WMMVF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 95% vs. WMMVF: 91%
Market capitalization -- COST: $419.07B vs. WMMVF: $51.88B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $419.07B. WMMVF’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $51.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $767B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $98.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWMMVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WMMVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both COST and WMMVF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMMVF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WMMVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than WMMVF.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а -2.55% price change this week, while WMMVF (@Discount Stores) price change was -6.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Sep 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (-1.16% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COST($419B) has a higher market cap than WMMVF($51.9B). COST has higher P/E ratio than WMMVF: COST (53.60) vs WMMVF (17.94). WMMVF YTD gains are higher at: 9.615 vs. COST (3.523). WMMVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 99.6B vs. COST (12.9B). WMMVF has more cash in the bank: 32.4B vs. COST (14.8B). COST has less debt than WMMVF: COST (8.18B) vs WMMVF (78.8B). WMMVF has higher revenues than COST: WMMVF (991B) vs COST (269B).
COSTWMMVFCOST / WMMVF
Capitalization419B51.9B807%
EBITDA12.9B99.6B13%
Gain YTD3.5239.61537%
P/E Ratio53.6017.94299%
Revenue269B991B27%
Total Cash14.8B32.4B46%
Total Debt8.18B78.8B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs WMMVF: Fundamental Ratings
COST
WMMVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7525
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
778
SMR RATING
1..100
10037
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10060
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
506

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WMMVF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COST (96) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WMMVF’s stock grew significantly faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for WMMVF (78) in the null industry. This means that COST’s stock grew significantly faster than WMMVF’s over the last 12 months.

WMMVF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COST (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WMMVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.

WMMVF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as COST (59) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WMMVF’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

WMMVF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COST (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WMMVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTWMMVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WMMVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTHS23.720.99
+4.33%
Pelthos Therapeutics Inc
PRGS46.841.46
+3.22%
Progress Software Corp
FBIZ52.490.43
+0.83%
First Business Financial Services
CR193.78-1.89
-0.97%
Crane Company
TAOP3.18-0.20
-6.06%
Taoping Inc

COST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been closely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COST
1D Price
Change %
COST100%
-0.48%
WMT - COST
70%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
BJ - COST
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
OLLI - COST
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
PSMT - COST
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
TBBB - COST
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
More

WMMVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMMVF has been loosely correlated with WMMVY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WMMVF jumps, then WMMVY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMMVF
1D Price
Change %
WMMVF100%
-4.68%
WMMVY - WMMVF
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
BMRPF - WMMVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COST - WMMVF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
OLLI - WMMVF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
BMRRY - WMMVF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More