The giant warehouse club Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and the world‑leading omnichannel retailer Walmart Inc. (WMT) dominate the discount‑shopping landscape in the United States and abroad. Comparing these two stocks is valuable for value‑oriented investors, growth‑focused traders, and analysts who track consumer‑spending trends. Both companies reported first‑quarter results for fiscal 2025 within the past 30 days, offering fresh data on sales, e‑commerce, membership dynamics, and profitability that illuminate their competitive positioning.
Costco operates a membership‑only warehouse model. In the most recent quarter, net sales reached $62.15 billion, a 7.5% rise year‑over‑year, driven by a 5.2% comparable‑sales increase and a 13% jump in e‑commerce sales (excluding gasoline price effects). The company recorded net income of $1.80 billion, translating to $4.04 earnings per share (EPS) on a diluted basis, comfortably above analysts’ $3.79 consensus. A modest 8% hike in annual membership fees added $1.17 billion to revenue, reinforcing the “membership‑driven” profit engine.
Operationally, total global inventory fell 2.7% while traffic rose 5.1%, indicating efficient stock management and strong member engagement. The average ticket remained flat, but the rollout of new product categories—such as premium Kirkland Signature items and a record‑setting bulk‑tire marketplace—expanded the value proposition. Costco’s cash flow remained robust, with operating cash generation of $3.26 billion, supporting its historically low leverage and continued dividend growth.
Walmart’s fiscal‑year‑2025 first quarter posted consolidated revenue of $161.5 billion, up 6% YoY, and adjusted operating income climbed 12.9% to $9.5 billion, reflecting a 42‑basis‑point (bps) gross‑margin expansion. Adjusted EPS of $0.60 beat the $0.49–$0.52 guidance range. E‑commerce sales surged 21% globally, propelled by a 22% increase in Walmart U.S. online traffic and a 36% rise in Marketplace sellers, now offering over 420 million SKUs.
Advertising revenue grew 24% (U.S. Walmart Connect up 26%), while membership income rose as Walmart + and Sam’s Club Plus achieved record enrollment and renewal rates. Inventory in the United States declined about 4%, supporting lower markdowns and healthier in‑stock levels. The company’s cash conversion remained solid, with $4.25 billion of operating cash generated, despite modest free‑cash‑flow pressure from continuing capital expenditures.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases dozens of AI‑powered trading bots that automatically scan thousands of tickers using diverse strategies—ranging from momentum and mean‑reversion to multi‑day swing and high‑frequency scalping. The platform reports that over 300 bots have backtested returns exceeding 150% and live win rates above 60% across different market regimes. Each bot is characterized by its own risk parameters, timeframes, and asset‑class focus, allowing traders to select models that best match current volatility and sector trends. The curated “Trending” section highlights only those bots delivering consistent performance in today’s market environment, inviting users to explore and deploy the most suitable algorithms.
Based on recent data, Tickeron’s AI models assign a higher probabilistic score to Walmart (WMT) for the next 30‑day horizon. The rationale centers on Walmart’s faster operating‑income growth relative to sales, its expanding high‑margin advertising and Marketplace businesses, and stronger cash‑flow conversion despite a larger balance‑sheet footprint. Costco (COST) remains a robust performer with superior member retention and disciplined inventory, but its slower margin expansion and reliance on a single revenue driver (membership fees) temper the AI’s near‑term outlook. Consequently, the AI leans toward Walmart while still recognizing Costco as a high‑quality, lower‑volatility hold.
“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.” Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COST’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а +0.34% price change this week, while WMT (@Discount Stores) price change was +2.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +5.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.16%.
COST is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2026.
WMT is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
| COST | WMT | COST / WMT | |
| Capitalization | 433B | 959B | 45% |
| EBITDA | 14.5B | 48.1B | 30% |
| Gain YTD | 13.463 | 8.587 | 157% |
| P/E Ratio | 49.08 | 42.43 | 116% |
| Revenue | 294B | 725B | 41% |
| Total Cash | 20B | 10.7B | 187% |
| Total Debt | 8.14B | 74.2B | 11% |
COST | WMT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WMT's Valuation (98) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (100). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.
WMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (13). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.
COST's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMT (37). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMT’s over the last 12 months.
COST's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMT (53). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMT’s over the last 12 months.
WMT's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (66). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.
| COST | WMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 32% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 38% | 11 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 48% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMT has been loosely correlated with COST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WMT jumps, then COST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| COST - WMT | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| BJ - WMT | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| PSMT - WMT | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.05% | ||
| TGT - WMT | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.64% | ||
| DLTR - WMT | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.14% | ||
More | ||||