COST
Price
$935.03
Change
+$8.97 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
414.67B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WMT
Price
$109.47
Change
+$1.07 (+0.99%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
871.17B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COST vs WMT

COST vs WMT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs. Walmart Inc. (WMT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • COST and WMT are two of the world's largest and most resilient retailers, yet they operate with fundamentally different business models — membership-driven warehouse clubs versus omnichannel mass retail.
  • Costco commands a higher valuation multiple (P/E near 47) compared to Walmart (P/E near 40), reflecting the market's premium for its membership-based recurring revenue and industry-leading renewal rates above 90%.
  • Walmart's e-commerce and advertising segments are growing significantly faster — with global e-commerce up roughly 25% and advertising revenue expanding over 30% in recent quarters — offering higher-margin diversification beyond traditional retail.
  • Both stocks have pulled back from their 52-week highs in recent months, with Costco down roughly 9% and Walmart down approximately 15% from their respective peaks amid valuation concerns and broader market rotation.
  • Costco's comparable sales momentum remains strong but has shown signs of deceleration month-over-month, while Walmart faces operating margin pressure from rising insurance claims, legal costs, and tariff-related headwinds.
  • Analyst consensus rates both stocks as "Moderate Buy," yet Walmart holds a notably higher proportion of Buy ratings and has shown stronger relative price performance over the trailing twelve-month period.

Introduction

Few rivalries in the consumer staples sector are as closely watched as the one between COST and WMT. Costco Wholesale Corporation and Walmart Inc. collectively serve hundreds of millions of customers each week, generating nearly $1 trillion in combined annual revenue. Both companies have outperformed the broader market over the past five years by capitalizing on value-conscious consumer behavior, supply chain scale, and digital transformation. Yet their paths to growth are increasingly distinct. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors weighing quality compounders in the retail space who want to understand how business model differences, valuation dynamics, and emerging growth engines may shape relative performance in the period ahead.

COST Overview and Recent Performance

Costco Wholesale Corporation operates 914 membership warehouses worldwide, with a concentrated presence in the United States and Canada, alongside growing international operations in markets such as Australia, Taiwan, and Mexico. Its business model is anchored by annual membership fees — which account for a substantial portion of operating profit — creating a highly predictable revenue stream and fostering exceptional customer loyalty. Membership renewal rates remain best-in-class at approximately 92.7% in the U.S. and Canada and 90.2% globally.

In recent weeks, Costco's net sales have continued to post healthy year-over-year gains, with June net sales reaching $29.24 billion, representing a 10.6% increase compared to the prior year. Comparable sales rose 8.8% during the same period, driven by traffic growth of over 4% worldwide and double-digit expansion in e-commerce. However, the pace of comparable sales growth has moderated sequentially — down from 12.5% in the prior month — which drew attention from investors given Costco's premium valuation. Adjusted for gasoline price deflation and foreign exchange, same-store sales growth stood at a still-robust 7%. The company also declared a quarterly dividend of $1.47 per share, underscoring its commitment to returning capital to shareholders. Sentiment around Costco remains generally constructive, though concerns about its elevated P/E ratio (price-to-earnings ratio) and competitive pricing pressure from rivals including Walmart have introduced caution among some market participants.

WMT Overview and Recent Performance

Walmart Inc. is the world's largest retailer by revenue, operating more than 10,750 stores across 19 countries and serving approximately 270 million customers weekly. Its business encompasses Walmart U.S., Sam's Club, and a diverse international portfolio that includes Walmex in Mexico, Flipkart in India, and operations in China. Unlike Costco's membership-only model, Walmart's core Supercenter format is open to all shoppers, while Sam's Club operates on a membership basis similar to Costco's warehouse approach.

Recent quarterly results have highlighted Walmart's accelerating transformation into an omnichannel and technology-driven enterprise. Revenue for its most recent reported quarter reached $177.75 billion, exceeding analyst expectations with year-over-year growth of approximately 7.4%. Global e-commerce sales surged roughly 25%, with U.S. store-fulfilled pickup and delivery orders growing nearly 50%. Walmart's advertising division, Walmart Connect, expanded by 31% domestically and 46% globally — signaling meaningful progress in higher-margin revenue streams. Membership income across Walmart+ and Sam's Club posted double-digit percentage increases. On the earnings side, adjusted EPS (earnings per share) matched consensus estimates at $0.66. The stock's beta of 0.60 reflects its historically defensive character, though shares have pulled back roughly 15% from their 52-week high as valuation debates have intensified. Analysts have also flagged headwinds related to self-insured liability claims, tariff exposure, and merchandise mix shifts toward lower-margin categories.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like COST and WMT, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across multiple timeframes and strategies. These bots span a diverse range of trading styles — from short-term momentum strategies to longer-duration trend-following models — each with its own performance track record, statistical profile, and set of traded tickers. Only those bots that demonstrate the strongest real-time alignment with current market dynamics earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section, making it a practical discovery tool for those interested in systematic, algorithm-driven approaches to the retail sector and beyond. Explore the full lineup at the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, Costco and Walmart reveal a study in strategic contrasts. Costco's membership-fee model generates a recurring, high-visibility income stream that insulates profitability during periods of retail margin compression. Its comparable sales growth rates — typically in the mid-to-high single digits — consistently exceed Walmart's, reflecting exceptional member engagement and higher average transaction values. Walmart, however, compensates with unmatched scale: its $680+ billion annual revenue base dwarfs Costco's, and its global store network provides geographic diversification that Costco's more concentrated footprint cannot match.

On the growth front, Walmart holds a clear advantage in digital acceleration. Its e-commerce sales are expanding at roughly 25% globally, compared to Costco's approximately 15% — and Walmart's advertising business, now contributing billions in annual revenue, represents a high-margin growth lever with no direct equivalent at Costco. Costco's digital growth, while solid, remains more tethered to its warehouse fulfillment model.

Valuation is perhaps the most debated dimension. Costco trades at a forward P/E of approximately 47, while Walmart sits near 40. Both multiples are elevated relative to historical retail sector norms — and both exceed the S&P 500 average — yet Walmart appears relatively less expensive on an earnings basis. Bloomberg data has shown that both stocks' forward earnings yields have dipped below the two-year Treasury yield at various points in recent months, an unusual configuration that underscores how much "safety premium" is embedded in both names.

Risk profiles also diverge. Costco's reliance on membership fees, while a strength, means any sustained decline in renewal rates would disproportionately impact profitability. Walmart faces its own challenges: rising self-insured liability costs, tariff-related inventory cost pressures, and legal expenses have weighed on operating margins. Both companies are navigating a consumer environment marked by moderating discretionary spending and intensifying price competition — including direct rivalry with each other.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, business model resilience, growth catalyst breadth, and relative valuation positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven framework would likely tilt in favor of WMT under current market conditions. Walmart's combination of faster digital revenue growth, a rapidly scaling high-margin advertising business, stronger trailing twelve-month price performance, and a relatively less demanding P/E multiple gives it a probabilistic edge in a risk-aware comparison. Costco remains an exceptional franchise with arguably the more durable business model, but its premium valuation and recent comparable sales deceleration introduce a higher bar for incremental outperformance. Neither stock is without risk, and the AI's assessment reflects a balance of momentum, diversification, and margin-of-safety considerations rather than any definitive prediction of future returns.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
COST vs. WMT commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a Buy and WMT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (COST: $926.06 vs. WMT: $108.40)
Brand notoriety: COST and WMT are both notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 45% vs. WMT: 51%
Market capitalization -- COST: $414.67B vs. WMT: $871.17B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $414.67B. WMT’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $871.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $871.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $156.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both COST and WMT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than WMT.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а -2.06% price change this week, while WMT (@Discount Stores) price change was -5.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2026.

WMT is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (-2.20% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMT($871B) has a higher market cap than COST($415B). COST has higher P/E ratio than WMT: COST (47.03) vs WMT (38.55). COST YTD gains are higher at: 7.692 vs. WMT (-2.317). WMT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 48.1B vs. COST (14.5B). COST has less debt than WMT: COST (8.14B) vs WMT (74.2B). WMT has higher revenues than COST: WMT (725B) vs COST (294B).
COSTWMTCOST / WMT
Capitalization415B871B48%
EBITDA14.5B48.1B30%
Gain YTD7.692-2.317-332%
P/E Ratio47.0338.55122%
Revenue294B725B41%
Total CashN/A10.7B-
Total Debt8.14B74.2B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs WMT: Fundamental Ratings
COST
WMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7956
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1616
SMR RATING
1..100
3438
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6155
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WMT's Valuation (96) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (98). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (16). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMT (38). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMT’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMT (60). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMT’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (61). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTWMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NARCX72.07N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp C
GSPSX33.57N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity Svc
BRXVX20.10N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R6
ESIGX17.03N/A
N/A
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Ins
AIGIX21.91N/A
N/A
Alger International Opportunities I

COST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COST
1D Price
Change %
COST100%
-0.13%
WMT - COST
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
TGT - COST
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
PSMT - COST
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
DG - COST
19%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
OLLI - COST
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
More

WMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMT has been loosely correlated with COST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WMT jumps, then COST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMT
1D Price
Change %
WMT100%
-0.85%
COST - WMT
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
PSMT - WMT
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
TGT - WMT
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
DG - WMT
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
DLTR - WMT
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.68%
More