COST
Price
$951.29
Change
+$26.55 (+2.87%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
422.05B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WMT
Price
$111.71
Change
-$3.98 (-3.44%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
890.03B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COST vs WMT

COST vs WMT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs. Walmart Inc. (WMT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Costco delivered 7.5% revenue growth and a record $4.04 EPS, outpacing Walmart’s 6% sales rise and $0.60 adjusted EPS.
  • Both retailers posted strong e‑commerce gains—Costco +13% versus Walmart +21%—but Walmart’s Marketplace seller base expanded 36%, widening its margin profile.
  • Costco’s membership fee hike boosted fee revenue by 8%, while Walmart’s membership programs (Walmart + and Sam’s Club Plus) generated record member counts and higher renewal rates.
  • Operating income grew faster than sales for both companies: Costco’s adjusted operating margin rose 42 bps; Walmart’s adjusted operating income surged 12.9%.
  • Inventory positions improved for both, with Costco’s global inventory down 2.7% and Walmart’s U.S. inventory falling ~4%.
  • Tickeron’s AI models favor the stock with more consistent margin expansion and stronger cash conversion—currently Walmart.

Introduction

The giant warehouse club Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and the world‑leading omnichannel retailer Walmart Inc. (WMT) dominate the discount‑shopping landscape in the United States and abroad. Comparing these two stocks is valuable for value‑oriented investors, growth‑focused traders, and analysts who track consumer‑spending trends. Both companies reported first‑quarter results for fiscal 2025 within the past 30 days, offering fresh data on sales, e‑commerce, membership dynamics, and profitability that illuminate their competitive positioning.

COST Overview and Recent Performance

Costco operates a membership‑only warehouse model. In the most recent quarter, net sales reached $62.15 billion, a 7.5% rise year‑over‑year, driven by a 5.2% comparable‑sales increase and a 13% jump in e‑commerce sales (excluding gasoline price effects). The company recorded net income of $1.80 billion, translating to $4.04 earnings per share (EPS) on a diluted basis, comfortably above analysts’ $3.79 consensus. A modest 8% hike in annual membership fees added $1.17 billion to revenue, reinforcing the “membership‑driven” profit engine.

Operationally, total global inventory fell 2.7% while traffic rose 5.1%, indicating efficient stock management and strong member engagement. The average ticket remained flat, but the rollout of new product categories—such as premium Kirkland Signature items and a record‑setting bulk‑tire marketplace—expanded the value proposition. Costco’s cash flow remained robust, with operating cash generation of $3.26 billion, supporting its historically low leverage and continued dividend growth.

WMT Overview and Recent Performance

Walmart’s fiscal‑year‑2025 first quarter posted consolidated revenue of $161.5 billion, up 6% YoY, and adjusted operating income climbed 12.9% to $9.5 billion, reflecting a 42‑basis‑point (bps) gross‑margin expansion. Adjusted EPS of $0.60 beat the $0.49–$0.52 guidance range. E‑commerce sales surged 21% globally, propelled by a 22% increase in Walmart U.S. online traffic and a 36% rise in Marketplace sellers, now offering over 420 million SKUs.

Advertising revenue grew 24% (U.S. Walmart Connect up 26%), while membership income rose as Walmart + and Sam’s Club Plus achieved record enrollment and renewal rates. Inventory in the United States declined about 4%, supporting lower markdowns and healthier in‑stock levels. The company’s cash conversion remained solid, with $4.25 billion of operating cash generated, despite modest free‑cash‑flow pressure from continuing capital expenditures.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases dozens of AI‑powered trading bots that automatically scan thousands of tickers using diverse strategies—ranging from momentum and mean‑reversion to multi‑day swing and high‑frequency scalping. The platform reports that over 300 bots have backtested returns exceeding 150% and live win rates above 60% across different market regimes. Each bot is characterized by its own risk parameters, timeframes, and asset‑class focus, allowing traders to select models that best match current volatility and sector trends. The curated “Trending” section highlights only those bots delivering consistent performance in today’s market environment, inviting users to explore and deploy the most suitable algorithms.

Head-to-Head Comparison

  • Business Model: Costco relies on a pure membership model with limited SKU breadth, emphasizing bulk pricing; Walmart blends low‑price retail with a massive e‑commerce platform and a diversified Marketplace.
  • Growth Drivers: Costco’s growth is anchored in membership fee increases and expanding private‑label depth, while Walmart’s surge stems from Marketplace seller expansion, advertising, and subscription services.
  • Margin Trends: Costco’s gross margin improved modestly (42 bps) due to lower markdowns; Walmart’s margin boost was larger, aided by high‑margin ad sales and a shift toward higher‑margin Marketplace fulfillment.
  • Risk Factors: Costco faces exposure to membership‑fee elasticity and supply‑chain constraints on bulk items; Walmart must manage integration risk from rapid Marketplace growth and price‑competition pressures across its vast product mix.
  • Sector Exposure: Both operate in Consumer Defensive, yet Walmart’s broader geographic footprint (19 countries) adds currency‑risk variability, whereas Costco’s concentration in the U.S. and Canada offers steadier earnings.
  • Market Sentiment: Analyst sentiment currently favors Walmart for its higher upside from ad‑tech and membership expansion, while Costco enjoys a premium valuation due to its consistent cash generation and lower leverage.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on recent data, Tickeron’s AI models assign a higher probabilistic score to Walmart (WMT) for the next 30‑day horizon. The rationale centers on Walmart’s faster operating‑income growth relative to sales, its expanding high‑margin advertising and Marketplace businesses, and stronger cash‑flow conversion despite a larger balance‑sheet footprint. Costco (COST) remains a robust performer with superior member retention and disciplined inventory, but its slower margin expansion and reliance on a single revenue driver (membership fees) temper the AI’s near‑term outlook. Consequently, the AI leans toward Walmart while still recognizing Costco as a high‑quality, lower‑volatility hold.

Disclaimer

“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.” Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COST vs. WMT commentary
Jul 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a Hold and WMT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2026
Stock price -- (COST: $952.54 vs. WMT: $115.69)
Brand notoriety: COST and WMT are both notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 277% vs. WMT: 151%
Market capitalization -- COST: $422.05B vs. WMT: $890.03B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $422.05B. WMT’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $890.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $890.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $160.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WMT is a better buy in the long-term than COST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than WMT.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while WMT (@Discount Stores) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2026.

WMT is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (+0.34% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMT($890B) has a higher market cap than COST($422B). COST has higher P/E ratio than WMT: COST (47.85) vs WMT (41.26). COST YTD gains are higher at: 10.771 vs. WMT (4.253). WMT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 48.1B vs. COST (14.5B). COST has more cash in the bank: 20B vs. WMT (10.7B). COST has less debt than WMT: COST (8.14B) vs WMT (74.2B). WMT has higher revenues than COST: WMT (725B) vs COST (294B).
COSTWMTCOST / WMT
Capitalization422B890B47%
EBITDA14.5B48.1B30%
Gain YTD10.7714.253253%
P/E Ratio47.8541.26116%
Revenue294B725B41%
Total Cash20B10.7B187%
Total Debt8.14B74.2B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs WMT: Fundamental Ratings
COST
WMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3589
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1510
SMR RATING
1..100
3437
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6852
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WMT's Valuation (98) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (99). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (15). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMT (37). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMT’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (54). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (68). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTWMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCEMX20.84N/A
N/A
PACE International Em Mkts Eq P
AGRCX134.65N/A
N/A
AB Growth C
FCPVX25.53N/A
N/A
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
SEQAX18.61N/A
N/A
NAA World Equity Income A
FSSEX14.60N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Sustainable Intl Eq

WMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMT has been loosely correlated with COST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WMT jumps, then COST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMT
1D Price
Change %
WMT100%
N/A
COST - WMT
66%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PSMT - WMT
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGT - WMT
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
DLTR - WMT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLLI - WMT
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More