53 days until earnings call

11 days until earnings call

Ad is loading...

COST vs WMT Comparison

Costco Wholesale

Price$822.08

Change+$5.19 (+0.64%)

Volume$894.65K

CapitalizationN/A

View a ticker or compare two or three

VS

VS

COST vs WMT Comparison Chart

Loading...

Show more...

Show more...

COST vs. WMT commentary

Aug 04, 2024

COMPARISON

Comparison

Aug 04, 2024

Stock price -- (**COST**: $822.12 vs. **WMT**: $68.46)

Brand notoriety: **COST** and **WMT** are both notable

Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: **COST**: 97% vs. **WMT**: 162%

Market capitalization -- **COST**: $364.47B vs. **WMT**: $550.66B

COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $364.47B. WMT’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $550.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $550.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $71.77B.

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

**COST**’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while**WMT**’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

**COST**’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.**WMT**’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

**COST**’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while **WMT**’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

**COST**’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.**WMT**’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

**COST** (@Discount Stores) experienced а +0.55% price change this week, while **WMT** (@Discount Stores) price change was -1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the **@Discount Stores** industry was -2.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.29%.

**COST** is expected to report earnings on Sep 26, 2024.

**WMT** is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2024.

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES

FUNDAMENTALS

Fundamentals

WMT($551B) has a higher market cap than COST($364B). COST has higher P/E ratio than WMT: COST (50.97) vs WMT (29.38). WMT YTD gains are higher at: 31.170 vs. COST (25.110). WMT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 41.1B vs. COST (12B). COST has less debt than WMT: COST (9.3B) vs WMT (64.5B). WMT has higher revenues than COST: WMT (657B) vs COST (254B).

COST | WMT | COST / WMT | |

Capitalization | 364B | 551B | 66% |

EBITDA | 12B | 41.1B | 29% |

Gain YTD | 25.110 | 31.170 | 81% |

P/E Ratio | 50.97 | 29.38 | 173% |

Revenue | 254B | 657B | 39% |

Total Cash | N/A | 9.41B | - |

Total Debt | 9.3B | 64.5B | 14% |

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS

COST vs WMT: Fundamental Ratings

COST | WMT | ||
---|---|---|---|

OUTLOOK RATING1..100 | 50 | 50 | |

VALUATIONovervalued / fair valued / undervalued1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |

PROFIT vs RISK RATING1..100 | 5 | 7 | |

SMR RATING1..100 | 32 | 40 | |

PRICE GROWTH RATING1..100 | 43 | 25 | |

P/E GROWTH RATING1..100 | 32 | 80 | |

SEASONALITY SCORE1..100 | n/a | 28 |

*Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.*

WMT's Valuation (84) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (95). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMT (7). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMT’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (32) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMT (40). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMT’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (43). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WMT (80). This means that COST’s stock grew somewhat faster than WMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Technical Analysis

COST | WMT | |
---|---|---|

RSIODDS (%) | 3 days ago33% | 3 days ago37% |

StochasticODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago55% |

MomentumODDS (%) | 3 days ago33% | 3 days ago31% |

MACDODDS (%) | 3 days ago43% | 3 days ago41% |

TrendWeekODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago33% |

TrendMonthODDS (%) | 3 days ago36% | 3 days ago46% |

AdvancesODDS (%) | 13 days ago65% | 19 days ago49% |

DeclinesODDS (%) | 6 days ago36% | 5 days ago33% |

BollingerBandsODDS (%) | 3 days ago42% | 3 days ago63% |

AroonODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 3 days ago48% |

View a ticker or compare two or three

VS

VS

Ad is loading...

Show more...

Show more...

Interesting Tickers

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.

1D

1W

1M

1Q

6M

1Y

5Y

Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COST | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|

COST | 100% | +0.64% | ||

WMT - COST | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||

BJ - COST | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||

OLLI - COST | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||

PSMT - COST | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.62% | ||

DLTR - COST | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||

More |