Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COSZX vs TRIGX
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts COSZX vs TRIGX
Columbia Overseas Value Inst
Price$14.52
Change-$0.05 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.57B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.58B
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COSZX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSZX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. COSZX (5.57B). COSZX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: COSZX (2.73) vs TRIGX (1.91). COSZX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: COSZX (18 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). COSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). COSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). COSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: COSZX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). COSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.55 vs. TRIGX (27.73). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 109.05 vs. COSZX (98.24).
| COSZX | TRIGX | COSZX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.87 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.498 | 36.315 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.57B | 16.6B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 1.91 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.55 | 27.73 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.65 | 106.63 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.24 | 109.05 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.86 | 101.67 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers