COVCF
Price
$15.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
RPAY
Price
$8.67
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
104 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COVCF vs RPAY

Header iconCOVCF vs RPAY Comparison
Open Charts COVCF vs RPAYBanner chart's image
COVER
Price$15.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Repay Holdings
Price$8.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.19M
CapitalizationN/A
COVCF vs RPAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
RPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COVCF vs. RPAY commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COVCF is a Hold and RPAY is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (COVCF: $15.60 vs. RPAY: $8.67)
Brand notoriety: COVCF and RPAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COVCF: 6% vs. RPAY: 190%
Market capitalization -- COVCF: $1.06B vs. RPAY: $978.87M
COVCF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.06B. RPAY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $978.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COVCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRPAY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COVCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RPAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COVCF is a better buy in the long-term than RPAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RPAY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RPAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

COVCF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +10.29% price change this week, while RPAY (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

RPAY is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COVCF($1.06B) has a higher market cap than RPAY($979M). COVCF has higher P/E ratio than RPAY: COVCF (66.67) vs RPAY (54.35). RPAY YTD gains are higher at: 1.522 vs. COVCF (-19.211). COVCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.53B vs. RPAY (78.3M). COVCF has higher revenues than RPAY: COVCF (20.5B) vs RPAY (297M).
COVCFRPAYCOVCF / RPAY
Capitalization1.06B979M109%
EBITDA3.53B78.3M4,508%
Gain YTD-19.2111.522-1,262%
P/E Ratio66.6754.35123%
Revenue20.5B297M6,902%
Total CashN/A118M-
Total DebtN/A443M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RPAY: Fundamental Ratings
RPAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RPAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBLGX67.440.17
+0.25%
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth A
CGCYX37.00-0.13
-0.35%
Columbia Greater China Inst3
DSCYX33.28-0.16
-0.48%
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Small Cap Y
REBYX30.60-0.29
-0.94%
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity Y
BGITX13.53-0.13
-0.95%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha 2

COVCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COVCF and NRDY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COVCF and NRDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COVCF
1D Price
Change %
COVCF100%
+3.52%
NRDY - COVCF
29%
Poorly correlated
-8.97%
VRNT - COVCF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
FIVN - COVCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
INTU - COVCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
RPAY - COVCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
More

RPAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RPAY has been loosely correlated with COMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RPAY jumps, then COMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RPAY
1D Price
Change %
RPAY100%
-1.37%
COMP - RPAY
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALRM - RPAY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
COIN - RPAY
46%
Loosely correlated
-10.78%
HOOD - RPAY
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.30%
IIIV - RPAY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
More