Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWG vs IMCG
COWG vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts COWG vs IMCG
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
Price$34.01
Change-$0.06 (-0.18%)
Volume$1.52M
Net Assets1.7B
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$76.12
Change-$0.48 (-0.63%)
Volume$85.61K
Net Assets2.65B
COWG vs IMCG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWG vs. IMCG commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Buy and IMCG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.65B vs. COWG (1.7B). COWG has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: COWG (6.164) vs IMCG (0.949). COWG was incepted earlier than IMCG: COWG (2 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than COWG (0.49). COWG has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| COWG | IMCG | COWG / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | 6.164 | 0.949 | 649% |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 2.65B | 64% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.06 | 817% |
| Turnover | 111.00 | 43.00 | 258% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.80 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWG | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 78% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| CDNS - COWG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| LRCX - COWG | 77% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| AMAT - COWG | 76% Closely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| MPWR - COWG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -0.63% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 83% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
More | ||||