Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWG vs IMCG
COWG vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts COWG vs IMCG
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
Price$34.22
Change-$0.34 (-0.98%)
Volume$494.94K
Net Assets1.99B
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$77.54
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Volume$262.07K
Net Assets2.7B
COWG vs IMCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWG vs. IMCG commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Hold and IMCG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.7B vs. COWG (1.99B). COWG has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: COWG (6.845) vs IMCG (3.013). COWG was incepted earlier than IMCG: COWG (3 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than COWG (0.49). COWG has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| COWG | IMCG | COWG / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | 6.845 | 3.013 | 227% |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 2.7B | 74% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.06 | 817% |
| Turnover | 111.00 | 43.00 | 258% |
| Yield | 0.31 | 0.75 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWG | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | -0.98% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 78% Closely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| CDNS - COWG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| LRCX - COWG | 77% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| AMAT - COWG | 76% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| MPWR - COWG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||