Advertisement
COWG vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Buy and LRCX is a Buy.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COWG | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GENT | 10.31 | 0.01 | +0.10% |
| Genter Capital Taxable Qual Interm ETF | |||
| QUVU | 25.75 | -0.07 | -0.28% |
| Hartford Quality Value ETF | |||
| SPTM | 75.30 | -0.59 | -0.78% |
| SPDR® Port S&P 1500 Comps Stk Mkt ETF | |||
| LTPZ | 51.41 | -0.48 | -0.93% |
| PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS ETF | |||
| EWUS | 40.44 | -0.75 | -1.81% |
| iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cp ETF | |||
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| CDNS - COWG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| LRCX - COWG | 77% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| AMAT - COWG | 76% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| MPWR - COWG | 75% Closely correlated | +2.72% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 92% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 92% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 85% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| ENTG - LRCX | 82% Closely correlated | -4.20% | ||
| VECO - LRCX | 82% Closely correlated | -3.82% | ||
More | ||||