Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWG vs QMOM
COWG vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts COWG vs QMOM
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
Price$36.62
Change+$0.27 (+0.74%)
Volume$189
Net Assets2.56B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$64.81
Change+$0.56 (+0.87%)
Volume$273
Net Assets336.88M
COWG vs QMOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWG vs. QMOM commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Hold and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWG has more net assets: 2.56B vs. QMOM (337M). COWG has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: COWG (13.614) vs QMOM (0.209). COWG was incepted earlier than QMOM: COWG (3 years) vs QMOM (10 years). QMOM (0.29) has a lower expense ratio than COWG (0.49). QMOM has a higher turnover COWG (108.00) vs COWG (108.00).
| COWG | QMOM | COWG / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 13.614 | 0.209 | 6,510% |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 337M | 761% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.29 | 169% |
| Turnover | 108.00 | 363.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 0.27 | 1.40 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 68% | 8 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KEYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KEYS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| KEYS - COWG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| CRWD - COWG | 73% Closely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| ZS - COWG | 72% Closely correlated | -4.09% | ||
| NOW - COWG | 70% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| META - COWG | 70% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | -0.49% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| KKR - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| ARES - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| APO - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||