Ad is loading...
COWG vs VOO
COWG vs VOO Comparison
Open Charts COWG vs VOO
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
Price$27.80
Change+$0.19 (+0.69%)
Volume$23.64K
Net Assets1.1B
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Price$463.56
Change-$1.96 (-0.42%)
Volume$31.29M
Net Assets1.32T
COWG vs VOO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWG vs. VOO commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Hold and VOO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOO has more net assets: 1.32T vs. COWG (1.1B). VOO (-13.303) and COWG (-13.814) have matching annual dividend yield . COWG was incepted earlier than VOO: COWG (2 years) vs VOO (15 years). VOO (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than COWG (0.49). COWG has a higher turnover VOO (2.00) vs VOO (2.00).
| COWG | VOO | COWG / VOO | |
| Gain YTD | -13.814 | -13.303 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 1.32T | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.03 | 1,633% |
| Turnover | 111.00 | 2.00 | 5,550% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 1.36 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWG | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PYLD | 26.19 | -0.16 | -0.61% |
| PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF | |||
| GEMD | 39.80 | -0.64 | -1.58% |
| Goldman Sachs Access Emrg Mkts USD BdETF | |||
| DEHP | 23.42 | -1.38 | -5.56% |
| Dimensional Em Mkts High Prof ETF | |||
| VOTE | 59.21 | -3.80 | -6.03% |
| TCW Transform 500 ETF | |||
| UCC | 33.33 | -3.09 | -8.48% |
| ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary | |||
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | -7.01% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 78% Closely correlated | -7.13% | ||
| CDNS - COWG | 77% Closely correlated | -6.44% | ||
| LRCX - COWG | 77% Closely correlated | -9.40% | ||
| AMAT - COWG | 76% Closely correlated | -6.32% | ||
| MPWR - COWG | 75% Closely correlated | -4.27% | ||
More | ||||