Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs FDIV
COWZ vs FDIV Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs FDIV
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$57.73
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
Volume$18.85K
Net Assets17.84B
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
Price$26.02
Change-$0.14 (-0.54%)
Volume$1.12K
Net Assets62.69M
COWZ vs FDIV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. FDIV commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Hold and FDIV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 17.8B vs. FDIV (62.7M). COWZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FDIV: COWZ (4.312) vs FDIV (-1.325). COWZ was incepted earlier than FDIV: COWZ (9 years) vs FDIV (2 years). FDIV (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than COWZ (0.49). FDIV has a higher turnover COWZ (151.00) vs COWZ (151.00).
| COWZ | FDIV | COWZ / FDIV | |
| Gain YTD | 4.312 | -1.325 | -325% |
| Net Assets | 17.8B | 62.7M | 28,389% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.35 | 140% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 242.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 1.62 | 3.14 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | FDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 78% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| FBIN - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| CE - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||
FDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDIV has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDIV jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDIV | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| TROW - FDIV | 78% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| PPG - FDIV | 76% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| RHI - FDIV | 71% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| LYB - FDIV | 71% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| AVY - FDIV | 71% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||