Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs FLOW
COWZ vs FLOW Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs FLOW
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$57.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
Volume$1.63M
Net Assets19.69B
Global X U.S. Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF
Price$34.72
Change+$0.13 (+0.38%)
Volume$572
Net Assets24.31M
COWZ vs FLOW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. FLOW commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Buy and FLOW is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 19.7B vs. FLOW (24.3M). FLOW has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: FLOW (12.555) vs COWZ (3.182). COWZ was incepted earlier than FLOW: COWZ (9 years) vs FLOW (2 years). FLOW (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than COWZ (0.49). COWZ has a higher turnover FLOW (87.62) vs FLOW (87.62).
| COWZ | FLOW | COWZ / FLOW | |
| Gain YTD | 3.182 | 12.555 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 19.7B | 24.3M | 81,070% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.25 | 196% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 87.62 | 172% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 1.99 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | FLOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 24 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 77% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 77% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| CMI - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
FLOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLOW has been loosely correlated with BRSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLOW jumps, then BRSL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLOW | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| BRSL - FLOW | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| SNA - FLOW | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| THC - FLOW | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
| UHS - FLOW | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.39% | ||
| RNG - FLOW | 14% Poorly correlated | +4.62% | ||
More | ||||