Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs IMCV
COWZ vs IMCV Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs IMCV
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$55.46
Change-$0.23 (-0.41%)
Volume$2M
Net Assets19.81B
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
Price$77.46
Change+$0.44 (+0.57%)
Volume$100
Net Assets726.47M
COWZ vs IMCV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. IMCV commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a StrongBuy and IMCV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 19.8B vs. IMCV (726M). IMCV has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: IMCV (4.948) vs COWZ (-1.099). COWZ was incepted earlier than IMCV: COWZ (9 years) vs IMCV (21 years). IMCV (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than COWZ (0.49). COWZ has a higher turnover IMCV (31.00) vs IMCV (31.00).
| COWZ | IMCV | COWZ / IMCV | |
| Gain YTD | -1.099 | 4.948 | -22% |
| Net Assets | 19.8B | 726M | 2,727% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.06 | 817% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 31.00 | 487% |
| Yield | 1.58 | 2.51 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 78% Closely correlated | -4.72% | ||
| PNR - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 75% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
More | ||||
IMCV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCV has been closely correlated with PFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCV jumps, then PFG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCV | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| PFG - IMCV | 86% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| MET - IMCV | 83% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| HBAN - IMCV | 82% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| PRU - IMCV | 82% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| DOV - IMCV | 82% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
More | ||||