Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs IMCV
COWZ vs IMCV Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs IMCV
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$57.73
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
Volume$18.85K
Net Assets17.93B
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
Price$78.49
Change-$0.47 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets860.45M
COWZ vs IMCV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. IMCV commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Hold and IMCV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 17.9B vs. IMCV (860M). IMCV has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: IMCV (7.516) vs COWZ (3.541). COWZ was incepted earlier than IMCV: COWZ (9 years) vs IMCV (21 years). IMCV (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than COWZ (0.49). COWZ has a higher turnover IMCV (31.00) vs IMCV (31.00).
| COWZ | IMCV | COWZ / IMCV | |
| Gain YTD | 3.541 | 7.516 | 47% |
| Net Assets | 17.9B | 860M | 2,081% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.06 | 817% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 31.00 | 487% |
| Yield | 1.62 | 2.27 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| FBIN - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| CE - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||
IMCV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCV has been closely correlated with PFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCV jumps, then PFG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCV | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| PFG - IMCV | 85% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| PRU - IMCV | 84% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| HBAN - IMCV | 84% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| MET - IMCV | 83% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| CFG - IMCV | 82% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
More | ||||