Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs TMDV
COWZ vs TMDV Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs TMDV
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$57.93
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Volume$1.52M
Net Assets19.98B
ProShares Russell US Dividend Grwr ETF
Price$48.83
Change+$0.40 (+0.83%)
Volume$213
Net Assets4.4M
COWZ vs TMDV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. TMDV commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Hold and TMDV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 20B vs. TMDV (4.4M). TMDV has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: TMDV (5.549) vs COWZ (3.306). COWZ was incepted earlier than TMDV: COWZ (9 years) vs TMDV (6 years). TMDV (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than COWZ (0.49). COWZ has a higher turnover TMDV (22.00) vs TMDV (22.00).
| COWZ | TMDV | COWZ / TMDV | |
| Gain YTD | 3.306 | 5.549 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 20B | 4.4M | 454,133% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.35 | 140% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 22.00 | 686% |
| Yield | 1.58 | 2.77 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | TMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| CMI - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 75% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
More | ||||
TMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMDV has been loosely correlated with GRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMDV jumps, then GRC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMDV | 100% | N/A | ||
| GRC - TMDV | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| SOLV - TMDV | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CBSH - TMDV | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
| UBSI - TMDV | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
| MKC - TMDV | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||