CPAMF
Price
$1.96
Change
+$0.18 (+10.11%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
13.44B
DBMBF
Price
$1.75
Change
-$0.16 (-8.38%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPAMF vs DBMBF

Header iconCPAMF vs DBMBF Comparison
Open Charts CPAMF vs DBMBFBanner chart's image
CAPITALAND INTEGRATED COML TR MGMT
Price$1.96
Change+$0.18 (+10.11%)
Volume$1.04K
Capitalization13.44B
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA
Price$1.75
Change-$0.16 (-8.38%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization1.35B
CPAMF vs DBMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAMF vs. DBMBF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAMF is a Hold and DBMBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CPAMF: $1.96 vs. DBMBF: $1.75)
Brand notoriety: CPAMF and DBMBF are both not notable
CPAMF represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while DBMBF is part of the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAMF: 27% vs. DBMBF: 25%
Market capitalization -- CPAMF: $13.44B vs. DBMBF: $1.35B
CPAMF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $13.44B. DBMBF’s [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] market capitalization is $1.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $102.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.29B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $8.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDBMBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DBMBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBMBF is a better buy in the long-term than CPAMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPAMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBMBF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPAMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DBMBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBMBF is a better buy in the short-term than CPAMF.

Price Growth

CPAMF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +6.52% price change this week, while DBMBF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +5.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.93%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.22% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (-0.33% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPAMF($13.4B) has a higher market cap than DBMBF($1.35B). CPAMF has higher P/E ratio than DBMBF: CPAMF (18.52) vs DBMBF (5.82). CPAMF YTD gains are higher at: 45.725 vs. DBMBF (18.581). DBMBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.76B vs. CPAMF (1.3B). DBMBF has more cash in the bank: 3.62B vs. CPAMF (170M). CPAMF has less debt than DBMBF: CPAMF (8.84B) vs DBMBF (22.6B). DBMBF has higher revenues than CPAMF: DBMBF (5B) vs CPAMF (1.58B).
CPAMFDBMBFCPAMF / DBMBF
Capitalization13.4B1.35B993%
EBITDA1.3B5.76B23%
Gain YTD45.72518.581246%
P/E Ratio18.525.82318%
Revenue1.58B5B32%
Total Cash170M3.62B5%
Total Debt8.84B22.6B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAMF vs DBMBF: Fundamental Ratings
CPAMF
DBMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9429
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5149
SMR RATING
1..100
9668
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
369
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBMBF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPAMF (91). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CPAMF (51). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew similarly to CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CPAMF (96). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew similarly to CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

CPAMF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as DBMBF (47). This means that CPAMF’s stock grew similarly to DBMBF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CPAMF (36). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew similarly to CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPAMFDBMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHK31.090.15
+0.48%
Schwab 1000 ETF
CGIC29.690.05
+0.17%
Capital Group International Cor Eq ETF
IBHE23.160.02
+0.09%
iShares iBonds 2025 Term HY and Inc ETF
CHGX26.53-0.02
-0.07%
EA SERIES TRUST STANCE SUSTAINABLE BETA ETF
COWS31.57-0.13
-0.41%
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF

CPAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAMF and FRZCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAMF and FRZCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAMF
1D Price
Change %
CPAMF100%
N/A
FRZCF - CPAMF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRKWF - CPAMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEGXF - CPAMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - CPAMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.56%
WDPSF - CPAMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
More

DBMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBMBF and CCPPF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBMBF and CCPPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBMBF
1D Price
Change %
DBMBF100%
-8.12%
CCPPF - DBMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYLOF - DBMBF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
CDPYF - DBMBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
CPAMF - DBMBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWYUF - DBMBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%