CPAMF
Price
$1.84
Change
-$0.12 (-6.12%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
13.59B
PRKWF
Price
$3.37
Change
+$0.17 (+5.31%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPAMF vs PRKWF

Header iconCPAMF vs PRKWF Comparison
Open Charts CPAMF vs PRKWFBanner chart's image
CAPITALAND INTEGRATED COML TR MGMT
Price$1.84
Change-$0.12 (-6.12%)
Volume$385
Capitalization13.59B
Parkway Life REIT
Price$3.37
Change+$0.17 (+5.31%)
Volume$500
Capitalization2.18B
CPAMF vs PRKWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRKWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAMF vs. PRKWF commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAMF is a Buy and PRKWF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CPAMF: $1.84 vs. PRKWF: $3.37)
Brand notoriety: CPAMF and PRKWF are both not notable
CPAMF represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while PRKWF is part of the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAMF: 12% vs. PRKWF: 126%
Market capitalization -- CPAMF: $13.59B vs. PRKWF: $2.18B
CPAMF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $13.59B. PRKWF’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $2.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.35B. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRKWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRKWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRKWF is a better buy in the long-term than CPAMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPAMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRKWF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPAMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PRKWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CPAMF and PRKWF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CPAMF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PRKWF (@Managed Health Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.75%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-1.17% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Managed Health Care (+0.66% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPAMF($13.6B) has a higher market cap than PRKWF($2.18B). PRKWF has higher P/E ratio than CPAMF: PRKWF (32.79) vs CPAMF (17.34). CPAMF YTD gains are higher at: 36.803 vs. PRKWF (32.157). CPAMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.3B vs. PRKWF (106M). CPAMF has more cash in the bank: 170M vs. PRKWF (49M). PRKWF has less debt than CPAMF: PRKWF (927M) vs CPAMF (8.84B). CPAMF has higher revenues than PRKWF: CPAMF (1.58B) vs PRKWF (151M).
CPAMFPRKWFCPAMF / PRKWF
Capitalization13.6B2.18B624%
EBITDA1.3B106M1,225%
Gain YTD36.80332.157114%
P/E Ratio17.3432.7953%
Revenue1.58B151M1,048%
Total Cash170M49M347%
Total Debt8.84B927M954%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAMF vs PRKWF: Fundamental Ratings
CPAMF
PRKWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8944
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5762
SMR RATING
1..100
9787
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4614
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRKWF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPAMF (91). This means that PRKWF’s stock grew significantly faster than CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

CPAMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as PRKWF (62). This means that CPAMF’s stock grew similarly to PRKWF’s over the last 12 months.

PRKWF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CPAMF (97). This means that PRKWF’s stock grew similarly to CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

CPAMF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PRKWF (48). This means that CPAMF’s stock grew similarly to PRKWF’s over the last 12 months.

PRKWF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as CPAMF (46). This means that PRKWF’s stock grew similarly to CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPAMFPRKWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRKWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VEVIX46.77N/A
N/A
Victory Sycamore Established Value I
JOMMX15.96N/A
N/A
JOHCM Emerging Mkts Discovery Instl
ESGCX19.96N/A
N/A
Mirova Global Megatrends C
CIVAX19.96-0.07
-0.35%
American Funds International Vntg 529-A
PISJX16.03-0.07
-0.43%
Columbia Pyrford International Stock R

CPAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAMF and FRZCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAMF and FRZCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAMF
1D Price
Change %
CPAMF100%
N/A
FRZCF - CPAMF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRKWF - CPAMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEGXF - CPAMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
MAPGF - CPAMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDPSF - CPAMF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PRKWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRKWF has been loosely correlated with FRZCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRKWF jumps, then FRZCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRKWF
1D Price
Change %
PRKWF100%
N/A
FRZCF - PRKWF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NTSGF - PRKWF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NRWRF - PRKWF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPAMF - PRKWF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INGEF - PRKWF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More