Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs NLSCX
CPCLX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs NLSCX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.56
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.04B
CPCLX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. NLSCX commentary
Oct 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.04B vs. CPCLX (1.15B). CPCLX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: CPCLX (2.82) vs NLSCX (0.00). CPCLX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: CPCLX (10 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPCLX: NLSCX (1000) vs CPCLX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. CPCLX (6.41). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 52.45 vs. NLSCX (16.93).
| CPCLX | NLSCX | CPCLX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.43 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.43 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.596 | 6.218 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 8.04B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 7.00 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.59 | 20.76 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.45 | 16.93 | 310% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement