Ad is loading...
CPCLX vs NLSCX
CPCLX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs NLSCX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.74
Change+$0.11 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
CPCLX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. NLSCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a StrongBuy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. CPCLX (1.03B). CPCLX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: CPCLX (3.06) vs NLSCX (0.00). CPCLX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: CPCLX (9 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPCLX: NLSCX (1000) vs CPCLX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.07 vs. CPCLX (0.18). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 52.23 vs. NLSCX (25.16).
| CPCLX | NLSCX | CPCLX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.43 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.43 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.441 | 1.752 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 7.33B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | 6.07 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.08 | 13.07 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.23 | 25.16 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 31.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers