Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs NLSCX
CPCLX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs NLSCX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.71
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.75B
CPCLX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.75B vs. CPCLX (1.14B). CPCLX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: CPCLX (2.80) vs NLSCX (0.00). CPCLX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: CPCLX (9 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPCLX: NLSCX (1000) vs CPCLX (2500). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.67 vs. NLSCX (7.49). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. NLSCX (18.34).
| CPCLX | NLSCX | CPCLX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.43 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.43 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.920 | 5.427 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 7.75B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.67 | 7.49 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.27 | 17.30 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.67 | 18.34 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement