Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs NLSIX
CPCLX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs NLSIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.52
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.48
Change+$0.09 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.43B
CPCLX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.43B vs. CPCLX (1.1B). CPCLX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: CPCLX (2.95) vs NLSIX (0.02). CPCLX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: CPCLX (9 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: CPCLX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). CPCLX (8.24) and NLSIX (7.95) have marching annual gain over last year. CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 55.52 vs. NLSIX (31.23).
| CPCLX | NLSIX | CPCLX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.32 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.32 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.332 | 3.893 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 7.43B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 0.02 | 13,906% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.24 | 7.95 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.92 | 19.95 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.52 | 31.23 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement