CPF
Price
$31.37
Change
+$0.42 (+1.36%)
Updated
Aug 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
846.68M
63 days until earnings call
FHB
Price
$25.59
Change
+$0.28 (+1.11%)
Updated
Aug 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.19B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPF vs FHB

Header iconCPF vs FHB Comparison
Open Charts CPF vs FHBBanner chart's image
Central Pacific Financial
Price$31.37
Change+$0.42 (+1.36%)
Volume$937
Capitalization846.68M
First Hawaiian
Price$25.59
Change+$0.28 (+1.11%)
Volume$11.63K
Capitalization3.19B
CPF vs FHB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPF vs. FHB commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPF is a Buy and FHB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CPF: $31.38 vs. FHB: $25.31)
Brand notoriety: CPF and FHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPF: 96% vs. FHB: 75%
Market capitalization -- CPF: $846.68M vs. FHB: $3.19B
CPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $846.68M. FHB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFHB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FHB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPF is a better buy in the long-term than FHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FHB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHB is a better buy in the short-term than CPF.

Price Growth

CPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.87% price change this week, while FHB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

FHB is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHB($3.19B) has a higher market cap than CPF($847M). CPF has higher P/E ratio than FHB: CPF (14.01) vs FHB (13.26). CPF YTD gains are higher at: 10.139 vs. FHB (0.591). FHB has more cash in the bank: 241M vs. CPF (77.8M). CPF has less debt than FHB: CPF (163M) vs FHB (250M). FHB has higher revenues than CPF: FHB (794M) vs CPF (262M).
CPFFHBCPF / FHB
Capitalization847M3.19B27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.1390.5911,715%
P/E Ratio14.0113.26106%
Revenue262M794M33%
Total Cash77.8M241M32%
Total Debt163M250M65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPF vs FHB: Fundamental Ratings
CPF
FHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1712
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3547
SMR RATING
1..100
2515
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4253
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHB's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (62). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (47). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

FHB's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (25). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (53). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (53). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPFFHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FANIX49.33N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Energy I
TIREX18.11N/A
N/A
Nuveen Real Estate Sec Sel R6
TZINX2.82N/A
N/A
Templeton Global Balanced Adv
JHQRX34.25N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity R6
PFGEX28.67-0.13
-0.45%
Parnassus Growth Equity Investor