CPF
Price
$28.88
Change
+$0.41 (+1.44%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
524.15M
7 days until earnings call
HOMB
Price
$29.13
Change
+$0.61 (+2.14%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.94B
90 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPF vs HOMB

Header iconCPF vs HOMB Comparison
Open Charts CPF vs HOMBBanner chart's image
Central Pacific Financial
Price$28.88
Change+$0.41 (+1.44%)
Volume$166.8K
Capitalization524.15M
Home BancShares
Price$29.13
Change+$0.61 (+2.14%)
Volume$2.12M
Capitalization4.94B
CPF vs HOMB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPF vs. HOMB commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPF is a Hold and HOMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CPF: $28.88 vs. HOMB: $29.13)
Brand notoriety: CPF and HOMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPF: 98% vs. HOMB: 246%
Market capitalization -- CPF: $524.15M vs. HOMB: $4.94B
CPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $524.15M. HOMB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHOMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HOMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPF is a better buy in the long-term than HOMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOMB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HOMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CPF and HOMB are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.30% price change this week, while HOMB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

HOMB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOMB($4.94B) has a higher market cap than CPF($524M). HOMB has higher P/E ratio than CPF: HOMB (12.42) vs CPF (8.93). HOMB YTD gains are higher at: 4.284 vs. CPF (1.364). HOMB has more cash in the bank: 226M vs. CPF (109M). CPF has less debt than HOMB: CPF (187M) vs HOMB (1.74B). HOMB has higher revenues than CPF: HOMB (978M) vs CPF (247M).
CPFHOMBCPF / HOMB
Capitalization524M4.94B11%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.3644.28432%
P/E Ratio8.9312.4272%
Revenue247M978M25%
Total Cash109M226M48%
Total Debt187M1.74B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPF vs HOMB: Fundamental Ratings
CPF
HOMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2414
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3716
SMR RATING
1..100
1811
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3356
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPF's Valuation (79) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (80). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

HOMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (37). This means that HOMB’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

HOMB's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (18). This means that HOMB’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (53). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (56). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPFHOMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEQCX36.43N/A
N/A
Putnam Large Cap Value C
SPGRX19.73N/A
N/A
DWS Equity Sector Strategy Fund Class S
RGCIX9.91N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure C
PRUZX15.58N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Utility Z
MCVSX19.91N/A
N/A
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C

HOMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOMB has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOMB jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOMB
1D Price
Change %
HOMB100%
+2.14%
FNB - HOMB
92%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
UBSI - HOMB
91%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
FFBC - HOMB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
HWC - HOMB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
FBK - HOMB
90%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
More