FNB
Price
$19.48
Change
+$0.15 (+0.78%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.88B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HOMB
Price
$31.40
Change
+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.27B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNB vs HOMB

FNB vs HOMB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) vs. Home BancShares, Inc. (HOMB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Scale vs. Efficiency: FNB operates a larger balance sheet with over $50 billion in total assets, while HOMB consistently delivers superior profitability metrics, including a net interest margin (NIM) above 4.5% and a sub-41% efficiency ratio.
  • Capital Strength Contrast: HOMB holds a significantly higher Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio of 16.4% versus FNB's 11.4%, giving HOMB a wider cushion against credit deterioration and greater capacity for shareholder returns.
  • Growth Strategies Diverge: FNB emphasizes organic growth through technology and digital banking investments, while HOMB recently completed the Mountain Commerce Bancorp acquisition, adding $1.47 billion in loans and expanding its Southeastern footprint.
  • Profitability Gap: HOMB's return on average assets (ROA) of 2.09% and return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) of 16.82% outpace FNB's approximately 1.27% and 14%, respectively, reflecting HOMB's leaner operating model.
  • Valuation Perspective: FNB trades at approximately 11x earnings with a ~3% dividend yield, while HOMB trades at roughly 12x earnings with a ~2.9% yield, reflecting the market's recognition of HOMB's efficiency premium.
  • AI Preference Leans Toward HOMB: Based on observable trend consistency, margin stability, and capital strength, Tickeron's AI analysis would likely favor HOMB in the current environment, though FNB's diversified revenue streams offer a different risk-reward profile.

Introduction

Regional banks occupy a critical segment of the U.S. financial landscape, serving as barometers for local economic health while competing for investor attention against larger national institutions. FNB (F.N.B. Corporation) and HOMB (Home BancShares, Inc.) represent two well-regarded regional banking franchises with distinct operating philosophies, geographic footprints, and financial profiles. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors evaluating regional bank exposure amid an environment shaped by shifting interest rate expectations, ongoing deposit competition, and evolving credit conditions. Whether an investor prioritizes scale and revenue diversification or operational efficiency and capital returns may determine which of these two names aligns better with their portfolio objectives.

FNB Overview and Recent Performance

F.N.B. Corporation, headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, operates through three business segments: Community Banking, Wealth Management, and Insurance. With total assets surpassing $50 billion as of late 2025, FNB has cemented its position as a meaningful regional banking franchise serving markets across Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland, West Virginia, the Carolinas, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. The company's "Clicks-to-Bricks" strategy and investments in artificial intelligence and data analytics have been central to its recent growth narrative.

In its most recently reported quarter, FNB posted record revenue of approximately $463 million and earnings per share (EPS) of $0.42, representing a 17% year-over-year increase. The company's net interest margin (NIM) — a key measure of lending profitability — held steady at 3.25%. Tangible book value per share grew 10% compared to the prior year, reaching $12.24. Loan growth accelerated to a 7.5% annualized linked-quarter pace, while the loan-to-deposit ratio stood at 92.5%. Credit quality remained solid, with net charge-offs representing just 0.19% of average loans on an annualized basis and non-performing assets at 0.31% of total loans. The company's CET1 capital ratio — a regulatory measure of a bank's core equity strength — reached 11.4%, and management continued to return capital through share repurchases, buying back $47 million in stock during the quarter.

HOMB Overview and Recent Performance

Home BancShares, Inc., based in Conway, Arkansas, is the parent company of Centennial Bank and operates approximately 227 branches across Arkansas, Florida, Texas, Tennessee, Alabama, and New York City. Known for its disciplined underwriting and cost-conscious culture, HOMB has built a reputation as one of the most efficiently run regional banks in the country, consistently ranking among the top performers on profitability metrics.

In recent market activity, HOMB delivered record total net revenue of $295.1 million in its latest quarter, up 10.6% from the prior period. On an adjusted basis — excluding merger-related expenses — net income reached a company-record $128.1 million, or $0.64 per diluted share. The quarter was marked by the completion of the Mountain Commerce Bancorp acquisition, which added $1.47 billion in loans and expanded the bank's Tennessee presence. Despite absorbing approximately $12.7 million in merger-related costs, HOMB maintained a NIM of 4.51%, flat with the prior quarter and up 7 basis points year-over-year — a level that substantially exceeds most regional banking peers. The adjusted efficiency ratio, which measures non-interest expenses as a percentage of revenue, improved to 40.46%, reflecting strong cost discipline. The CET1 capital ratio stood at 16.4%, while tangible book value per share rose to $15.32. HOMB repurchased 1.5 million shares during the quarter at an average price of $26.94, underscoring management's commitment to shareholder returns alongside growth.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment defined by shifting rate expectations, regional banking dynamics, and sector rotation, traders are increasingly turning to technology-driven tools for timely decision-making. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the platform's best-performing AI-powered trading bots from a universe of hundreds of available algorithms, each designed to trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies and timeframes. These bots employ Financial Learning Models (FLMs) — purpose-built AI architectures that continuously ingest market data, adapt to changing conditions, and execute trades without emotional bias. Recent performance data shows top bots delivering annualized returns ranging from approximately 35% to over 100%, with win rates between 57% and 75% and profit factors as high as 4.53. The Trending AI Robots section highlights only those bots best suited for current market conditions, spanning strategies from short-term swing trading to longer-duration trend-following approaches across both individual equities and diversified portfolios. Explore the curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots on Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are currently leading.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, FNB and HOMB reveal two sharply contrasting approaches to regional banking. FNB's strength lies in its scale and diversification: with over $50 billion in assets, seven fee-based business lines, and a growing wealth management and insurance platform, the company generates a broader revenue mix that can cushion earnings against interest rate cycles. HOMB, by contrast, runs a more concentrated and highly efficient traditional banking model that produces metrics most peers cannot match.

The efficiency gap is substantial. HOMB's adjusted efficiency ratio of approximately 40% means it spends just 40 cents to generate each dollar of revenue, compared to roughly 54 cents for FNB. Similarly, HOMB's NIM of 4.51% dwarfs FNB's 3.25%, reflecting HOMB's lower-cost deposit base and higher-yielding loan portfolio — characteristics partly driven by its heavy concentration in faster-growing Sunbelt markets like Florida and Texas. On capital strength, HOMB's CET1 ratio of 16.4% sits well above FNB's 11.4%, giving HOMB more flexibility for acquisitions, buybacks, and dividend increases.

However, FNB is not without its own advantages. Its technology investments and focus on artificial intelligence may position it for stronger long-term operating leverage as digital banking adoption accelerates. FNB also carries a somewhat lower price-to-tangible-book valuation, which value-oriented investors may find appealing. Additionally, FNB's larger asset base and multi-state footprint provide diversification that reduces reliance on any single regional economy — a risk factor worth considering given HOMB's significant exposure to Florida and Arkansas markets.

On the growth front, FNB has been expanding organically through loan and deposit growth, while HOMB's recent Mountain Commerce acquisition signals a willingness to supplement organic growth with disciplined M&A (mergers and acquisitions). Both approaches carry distinct risk profiles: organic growth is steadier but slower, while acquisition-driven growth offers immediate scale but introduces integration risk.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, margin stability, capital strength, and operational efficiency, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely express a preference for HOMB in the current market environment. The combination of a superior net interest margin that has remained stable at 4.51%, an industry-leading efficiency ratio near 40%, and a CET1 capital cushion exceeding 16% creates a profile of resilience that AI models typically favor when evaluating regional banks. HOMB's recent acquisition integration appears to be progressing ahead of schedule, and the bank's Sunbelt-focused geographic footprint places it in regions with stronger population and economic growth trends. That said, FNB remains a well-managed franchise with meaningful technology-driven competitive advantages that could generate improving returns over time, particularly if scale efficiencies continue to materialize. The AI verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive — it reflects a near-term assessment based on observable data patterns, not a permanent judgment on either institution's long-term prospects.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FNB vs. HOMB commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNB is a StrongBuy and HOMB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FNB: $19.33 vs. HOMB: $31.35)
Brand notoriety: FNB and HOMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNB: 45% vs. HOMB: 60%
Market capitalization -- FNB: $6.88B vs. HOMB: $6.27B
FNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.88B. HOMB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHOMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HOMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FNB and HOMB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOMB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HOMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the short-term than HOMB.

Price Growth

FNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.90% price change this week, while HOMB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

HOMB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNB($6.88B) has a higher market cap than HOMB($6.27B). HOMB has higher P/E ratio than FNB: HOMB (12.95) vs FNB (11.51). HOMB (15.414) and FNB (14.698) have similar YTD gains . FNB has more cash in the bank: 452M vs. HOMB (296M). HOMB has less debt than FNB: HOMB (780M) vs FNB (3.14B). FNB has higher revenues than HOMB: FNB (1.8B) vs HOMB (1.11B).
FNBHOMBFNB / HOMB
Capitalization6.88B6.27B110%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.69815.41495%
P/E Ratio11.5112.9589%
Revenue1.8B1.11B163%
Total Cash452M296M153%
Total Debt3.14B780M402%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNB vs HOMB: Fundamental Ratings
FNB
HOMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7587
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2626
SMR RATING
1..100
2228
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5650
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNB's Valuation (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (57). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (26). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's SMR Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (28). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

HOMB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (47). This means that HOMB’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

HOMB's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (56). This means that HOMB’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNBHOMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STMX.X0.0000120.000001
+9.92%
StormX cryptocurrency
ONG.X0.0423730.001977
+4.89%
Ontology Gas cryptocurrency
ALPINE.X0.3183550.004221
+1.34%
Alpine F1 Team Fan Token cryptocurrency
SNX.X0.1977870.001029
+0.52%
Synthetix cryptocurrency
NEAR.X1.639464-0.003256
-0.20%
NEAR Protocol cryptocurrency

FNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNB has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNB jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNB
1D Price
Change %
FNB100%
+0.31%
ASB - FNB
90%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
ONB - FNB
90%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
WTFC - FNB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
ZION - FNB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
HWC - FNB
87%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
More

HOMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOMB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOMB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOMB
1D Price
Change %
HOMB100%
+0.74%
UBSI - HOMB
87%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
FULT - HOMB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
INDB - HOMB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
UCB - HOMB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
FNB - HOMB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
More