CPHC
Price
$17.69
Change
+$0.08 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jun 6, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
113.26M
GMBLP
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.06 (-40.00%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPHC vs GMBLP

Header iconCPHC vs GMBLP Comparison
Open Charts CPHC vs GMBLPBanner chart's image
Canterbury Park Holding
Price$17.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization113.26M
Esports Entertainment Group
Price$0.09
Change-$0.06 (-40.00%)
Volume$1.28K
CapitalizationN/A
CPHC vs GMBLP Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPHC vs. GMBLP commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPHC is a StrongBuy and GMBLP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CPHC: $17.61 vs. GMBLP: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: CPHC and GMBLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPHC: 70% vs. GMBLP: 93%
Market capitalization -- CPHC: $113.26M vs. GMBLP: $0
CPHC [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $113.26M. GMBLP’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMBLP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMBLP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMBLP is a better buy in the long-term than CPHC.

Price Growth

CPHC (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -2.00% price change this week, while GMBLP (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -40.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPHC is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-1.20% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMBLP YTD gains are higher at: 73.077 vs. CPHC (-13.767). CPHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.31M vs. GMBLP (-25.74M). CPHC has more cash in the bank: 26.9M vs. GMBLP (303K). CPHC has less debt than GMBLP: CPHC (62.4K) vs GMBLP (70.4K). CPHC has higher revenues than GMBLP: CPHC (61.4M) vs GMBLP (16.1M).
CPHCGMBLPCPHC / GMBLP
Capitalization113MN/A-
EBITDA8.31M-25.74M-32%
Gain YTD-13.76773.077-19%
P/E Ratio10.70N/A-
Revenue61.4M16.1M381%
Total Cash26.9M303K8,878%
Total Debt62.4K70.4K89%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPHC: Fundamental Ratings
CPHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRERX15.95N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Eq Retire
FALIX54.86N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap I
AMRGX6.97N/A
N/A
American Growth One D
EMECX11.30N/A
N/A
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity C
RMGSX11.16-0.01
-0.09%
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat S

CPHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPHC and GMBLP have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPHC and GMBLP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPHC
1D Price
Change %
CPHC100%
N/A
GMBLP - CPHC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCRI - CPHC
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
RRR - CPHC
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
GDEN - CPHC
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
CZR - CPHC
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
More

GMBLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMBLP and CPHC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMBLP and CPHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMBLP
1D Price
Change %
GMBLP100%
N/A
CPHC - GMBLP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNTY - GMBLP
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
CZR - GMBLP
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
VAC - GMBLP
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
LTRY - GMBLP
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.67%
More