CPHC
Price
$18.04
Change
-$0.36 (-1.96%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
113.26M
GMBLP
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPHC vs GMBLP

Header iconCPHC vs GMBLP Comparison
Open Charts CPHC vs GMBLPBanner chart's image
Canterbury Park Holding
Price$18.04
Change-$0.36 (-1.96%)
Volume$1.32K
Capitalization113.26M
Esports Entertainment Group
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$110
CapitalizationN/A
CPHC vs GMBLP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMBLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPHC vs. GMBLP commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPHC is a StrongBuy and GMBLP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CPHC: $18.04 vs. GMBLP: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: CPHC and GMBLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPHC: 21% vs. GMBLP: 6%
Market capitalization -- CPHC: $113.26M vs. GMBLP: $0
CPHC [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $113.26M. GMBLP’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMBLP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMBLP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPHC is a better buy in the long-term than GMBLP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMBLP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GMBLP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPHC is a better buy in the short-term than GMBLP.

Price Growth

CPHC (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -2.49% price change this week, while GMBLP (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -10.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPHC is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+0.06% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMBLP YTD gains are higher at: 17.885 vs. CPHC (-11.332). CPHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.31M vs. GMBLP (-25.74M). CPHC has more cash in the bank: 26.9M vs. GMBLP (303K). CPHC has less debt than GMBLP: CPHC (62.4K) vs GMBLP (70.4K). CPHC has higher revenues than GMBLP: CPHC (61.4M) vs GMBLP (16.1M).
CPHCGMBLPCPHC / GMBLP
Capitalization113MN/A-
EBITDA8.31M-25.74M-32%
Gain YTD-11.33217.885-63%
P/E Ratio10.70N/A-
Revenue61.4M16.1M381%
Total Cash26.9M303K8,878%
Total Debt62.4K70.4K89%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPHC: Fundamental Ratings
CPHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPHCGMBLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMBLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSPD56.400.60
+1.08%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Cnsm Disc ETF
AGGY43.460.07
+0.16%
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced US Aggt Bd ETF
IRVH21.06N/A
N/A
Global X Interest Rt Vol & Infl Hdg ETF
EFV65.30-0.06
-0.09%
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
BDRY7.15-0.27
-3.64%
Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF

CPHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPHC and GMBLP have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPHC and GMBLP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPHC
1D Price
Change %
CPHC100%
-2.12%
GMBLP - CPHC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLL - CPHC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
MCRI - CPHC
19%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
CZR - CPHC
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
GDEN - CPHC
16%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
More

GMBLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMBLP and CPHC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMBLP and CPHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMBLP
1D Price
Change %
GMBLP100%
N/A
CPHC - GMBLP
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
CNTY - GMBLP
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
CZR - GMBLP
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
VAC - GMBLP
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
SEGG - GMBLP
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
More