Advertisement
CPHC vs RRR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPHC is a Hold and RRR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRRR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CPHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RRR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPHC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RRR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CPHC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -3.82% price change this week, while RRR (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -6.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
RRR is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-3.02% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| CPHC | RRR | CPHC / RRR | |
| Capitalization | 78.4M | 3.28B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 6.75M | 793M | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -24.108 | 22.650 | -106% |
| P/E Ratio | 522.67 | 17.48 | 2,990% |
| Revenue | 60.1M | 1.99B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 8.87M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 151K | 3.41B | 0% |
CPHC | RRR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RRR's Valuation (30) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPHC (93) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that RRR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPHC’s over the last 12 months.
RRR's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPHC (81) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that RRR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPHC’s over the last 12 months.
RRR's SMR Rating (14) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPHC (87) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that RRR’s stock grew significantly faster than CPHC’s over the last 12 months.
RRR's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as CPHC (76) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that RRR’s stock grew similarly to CPHC’s over the last 12 months.
CPHC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RRR (45) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RRR’s over the last 12 months.
| CPHC | RRR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 67% | 10 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% |
Advertisement
CPHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPHC and GMBLP have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPHC and GMBLP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPHC | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| GMBLP - CPHC | 23% Poorly correlated | -22.99% | ||
| DKNG - CPHC | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| CZR - CPHC | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| GDEN - CPHC | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
| RRR - CPHC | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||
RRR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRR has been closely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RRR jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RRR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRR | 100% | -1.03% | ||
| BYD - RRR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| CZR - RRR | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| MGM - RRR | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| PENN - RRR | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| CHDN - RRR | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
More | ||||