CPK
Price
$135.45
Change
+$0.72 (+0.53%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.26B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SR
Price
$82.92
Change
+$0.21 (+0.25%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.9B
104 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPK vs SR

CPK vs SR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) vs. Spire Inc. (SR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CPK and SR are both regulated natural gas utilities, but they operate with distinct geographic footprints and growth strategies that appeal to different investor profiles.
  • Chesapeake Utilities has demonstrated stronger earnings growth momentum in recent quarters, driven by its diversified energy delivery platform and strategic expansion into high-growth markets.
  • Spire Inc. offers a more established Midwestern utility profile with a growing emphasis on midstream gas operations, providing a different risk-reward balance.
  • Both stocks have faced the broader utility sector headwinds of elevated interest rates, though their defensive characteristics have attracted capital during periods of market uncertainty.
  • Relative valuation metrics and dividend profiles differ meaningfully, giving each ticker a distinct appeal depending on whether investors prioritize income or growth.
  • AI-driven analysis suggests one of these two utilities currently holds an edge in trend consistency and near-term positioning.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the regulated utility sector often evaluate multiple names to determine which offers the most compelling combination of stability, income, and growth potential. CPK (Chesapeake Utilities Corporation) and SR (Spire Inc.) both operate as natural gas distribution companies serving residential, commercial, and industrial customers. While they share a common industry classification, their market positioning, geographic concentration, and recent performance trajectories present a meaningful contrast. This comparison examines how these two utility stocks stack up across key dimensions including recent business developments, relative momentum, and what an AI-powered analytical framework might prioritize in the current market environment.

CPK Overview and Recent Performance

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, headquartered in Dover, Delaware, operates as a diversified energy company with regulated natural gas distribution, transmission, and propane distribution operations spanning the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern United States. The company serves approximately 140,000 natural gas customers across Delaware, Maryland, and Florida, while also engaging in electricity distribution on Florida's Eastern Shore. In recent trading periods, CPK has drawn attention for its consistent execution of a growth-through-acquisition strategy, including the integration of recent pipeline and distribution assets. The company's expansion into Florida — one of the fastest-growing states for new natural gas hookups — has been a notable contributor to its customer base growth. Over the past several weeks, Chesapeake Utilities' share price has reflected a generally constructive tone, supported by steady earnings results and the market's recognition of its above-average earnings per share growth trajectory relative to the regulated utility peer group.

SR Overview and Recent Performance

Spire Inc., based in St. Louis, Missouri, is a publicly traded natural gas utility holding company serving approximately 1.7 million customers across Alabama, Mississippi, and Missouri. Beyond its core regulated utility operations, Spire has meaningfully expanded into the midstream gas storage and transportation business through its Spire Storage and Spire STL Pipeline segments. In recent market activity, SR has navigated a mixed backdrop: the company has benefited from the defensive characteristics that define utility equities during periods of macroeconomic uncertainty, yet faces ongoing regulatory and cost-recovery considerations tied to its midstream investments. Spire's management has continued to emphasize its long-term infrastructure growth plans, including modernization of its distribution network and expansion of storage capacity. The stock's recent trading range has reflected a balance between the stability of its regulated earnings base and questions surrounding the pace of returns from its non-regulated ventures.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most compelling algorithmic trading tools, drawn from a universe of hundreds of AI-powered bots that trade across thousands of different tickers. These bots are not randomly assembled — each one that appears in the Trending section has earned its place by demonstrating adaptability to current market conditions and delivering noteworthy statistical profiles. Traders can explore bots with varying hit rates, trade frequencies, and risk parameters: some bots specialize in high-probability short-term swings, while others target sustained multi-week trends. Performance metrics such as annualized returns, Sharpe ratios, and maximum drawdown figures are available for each bot, allowing users to assess fit before committing capital. Whether you are focused on individual stocks like CPK and SR or prefer sector-level strategies, visiting the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify which automated strategies are currently aligned with evolving market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing CPK and SR side by side, several distinct contrasts emerge. From a business model perspective, Chesapeake Utilities operates with a more diversified energy delivery platform that includes propane distribution and electricity operations alongside its natural gas utility, whereas Spire Inc. is more concentrated in natural gas distribution with a notable midstream (gas storage and pipeline transportation) overlay. Growth drivers also diverge: CPK has leaned heavily on geographic expansion into high-population-growth markets like Florida, while SR has pursued infrastructure investment and storage assets as its primary growth levers. In terms of scale, Spire's customer base is substantially larger at roughly 1.7 million compared to Chesapeake's 140,000, though Chesapeake's smaller base has translated into faster percentage growth rates. Risk factors differ too: Spire carries more exposure to regulatory outcomes tied to midstream cost recovery, while Chesapeake faces integration risk from its acquisition-oriented strategy. On market sentiment, both stocks have experienced the gravitational pull of the interest rate environment — higher rates tend to compress utility valuations — but Chesapeake's growth narrative has provided a relative buffer against sector-wide pressure in recent weeks.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on an analysis of trend consistency, relative price momentum, earnings trajectory, and sector-relative positioning, Tickeron's AI framework would likely assign a marginal preference to CPK (Chesapeake Utilities Corporation) over SR (Spire Inc.) in the current market environment. This assessment is driven by Chesapeake's more pronounced earnings growth profile, its successful penetration of the demographically advantaged Florida market, and the stock's comparatively steadier technical posture over recent trading periods. However, this probabilistic view does not dismiss Spire's merits — its larger scale, established dividend history, and midstream optionality offer a different value proposition that may prove more resilient under certain interest-rate or regulatory scenarios. The AI analysis emphasizes that both stocks warrant monitoring, but the current weight of observable data tilts slightly in Chesapeake's favor for near-term trend alignment. This conclusion reflects a quantitative assessment of patterns rather than a qualitative judgment about either company's long-term prospects.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CPK vs. SR commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPK is a StrongBuy and SR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CPK: $134.73 vs. SR: $82.71)
Brand notoriety: CPK and SR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Gas Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPK: 69% vs. SR: 87%
Market capitalization -- CPK: $3.25B vs. SR: $4.89B
CPK [@Gas Distributors] is valued at $3.25B. SR’s [@Gas Distributors] market capitalization is $4.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Gas Distributors] industry ranges from $29.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Gas Distributors] industry is $6.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SR is a better buy in the long-term than CPK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SR is a better buy in the short-term than CPK.

Price Growth

CPK (@Gas Distributors) experienced а +0.66% price change this week, while SR (@Gas Distributors) price change was +2.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

SR is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Gas Distributors (+0.15% weekly)

Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SR($4.9B) has a higher market cap than CPK($3.26B). CPK has higher P/E ratio than SR: CPK (21.62) vs SR (18.31). CPK YTD gains are higher at: 9.210 vs. SR (1.975). SR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 886M vs. CPK (384M). CPK has less debt than SR: CPK (1.67B) vs SR (7.96B). SR has higher revenues than CPK: SR (2.6B) vs CPK (984M).
CPKSRCPK / SR
Capitalization3.26B4.9B67%
EBITDA384M886M43%
Gain YTD9.2101.975466%
P/E Ratio21.6218.31118%
Revenue984M2.6B38%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.67B7.96B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPK vs SR: Fundamental Ratings
CPK
SR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6422
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7240
SMR RATING
1..100
7471
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5340
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SR's Valuation (18) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPK (78). This means that SR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPK’s over the last 12 months.

SR's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as CPK (72). This means that SR’s stock grew similarly to CPK’s over the last 12 months.

SR's SMR Rating (71) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as CPK (74). This means that SR’s stock grew similarly to CPK’s over the last 12 months.

CPK's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as SR (55). This means that CPK’s stock grew similarly to SR’s over the last 12 months.

SR's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as CPK (53). This means that SR’s stock grew similarly to CPK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPKSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UFOD26.140.34
+1.31%
Tuttle Capital UFO Disclosure ETF
INTF43.100.16
+0.38%
iShares International Equity Factor ETF
CCFE27.640.06
+0.22%
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF
BRHY50.920.05
+0.09%
iShares High Yield Active ETF
DWX47.850.04
+0.08%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Intl Div ETF

CPK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPK has been closely correlated with OGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CPK jumps, then OGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPK
1D Price
Change %
CPK100%
+0.88%
OGS - CPK
76%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
NJR - CPK
68%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
SR - CPK
67%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
ATO - CPK
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
NWN - CPK
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
More

SR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SR has been closely correlated with OGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SR jumps, then OGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SR
1D Price
Change %
SR100%
+0.32%
OGS - SR
79%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
NWN - SR
75%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
CPK - SR
69%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
BKH - SR
66%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
NJR - SR
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
More