Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLSX vs DHLSX
CPLSX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$17.79
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$29.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
CPLSX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. DHLSX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a Buy and DHLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. CPLSX (1.13B). CPLSX pays higher dividends than DHLSX: CPLSX (3.38) vs DHLSX (2.09). CPLSX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPLSX (9 years) vs DHLSX (20 years). CPLSX (2.44) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). CPLSX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.25 vs. DHLSX (4.73). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 62.41 vs. DHLSX (33.12).
| CPLSX | DHLSX | CPLSX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.46 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.46 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.536 | 10.206 | 113% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 1.94B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.38 | 2.09 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.25 | 4.73 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.10 | 18.34 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.41 | 33.12 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement