Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLSX vs DHLSX
CPLSX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$17.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$30.90
Change+$0.22 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
CPLSX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. DHLSX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a Buy and DHLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. CPLSX (1.13B). CPLSX pays higher dividends than DHLSX: CPLSX (3.34) vs DHLSX (2.02). CPLSX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPLSX (10 years) vs DHLSX (21 years). CPLSX (2.44) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). CPLSX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. DHLSX (3.81). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 60.55 vs. DHLSX (34.06).
| CPLSX | DHLSX | CPLSX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.46 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.46 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.404 | 13.043 | 72% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 2.11B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.34 | 2.02 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 3.81 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.58 | 25.62 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.55 | 34.06 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement