Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLSX vs DHLSX
CPLSX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$17.75
Change+$0.08 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$30.58
Change+$0.21 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
CPLSX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. DHLSX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a Buy and DHLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. CPLSX (1.14B). CPLSX pays higher dividends than DHLSX: CPLSX (3.31) vs DHLSX (2.05). CPLSX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPLSX (9 years) vs DHLSX (21 years). CPLSX (2.44) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). CPLSX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. DHLSX (4.40). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 68.15 vs. DHLSX (38.54).
| CPLSX | DHLSX | CPLSX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.46 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.46 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.285 | 12.675 | 89% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 2.08B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 2.05 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 4.40 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.82 | 29.80 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.15 | 38.54 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement