Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLSX vs NLSCX
CPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs NLSCX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$17.75
Change+$0.08 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.78
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
CPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.83B vs. CPLSX (1.14B). CPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: CPLSX (3.31) vs NLSCX (0.00). CPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: CPLSX (9 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). CPLSX (2.44) and NLSCX (2.43) have similar cost to investors . CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs CPLSX (2500). CPLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. NLSCX (7.81). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 68.15 vs. NLSCX (19.85).
| CPLSX | NLSCX | CPLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 2.43 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 2.43 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.285 | 6.162 | 183% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 7.83B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 7.81 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.82 | 20.92 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.15 | 19.85 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement