CPMV
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.01 (+2.56%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.91M
HLOSF
Price
$4.11
Change
-$0.34 (-7.64%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
402.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPMV vs HLOSF

Header iconCPMV vs HLOSF Comparison
Open Charts CPMV vs HLOSFBanner chart's image
Mosaic ImmunoEngineering
Price$0.40
Change+$0.01 (+2.56%)
Volume$1.43K
Capitalization2.91M
HEALIOS K K
Price$4.11
Change-$0.34 (-7.64%)
Volume$249
Capitalization402.48M
CPMV vs HLOSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPMV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPMV vs. HLOSF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPMV is a Hold and HLOSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CPMV: $0.40 vs. HLOSF: $4.11)
Brand notoriety: CPMV and HLOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPMV: 158% vs. HLOSF: 29%
Market capitalization -- CPMV: $2.91M vs. HLOSF: $402.48M
CPMV [@Biotechnology] is valued at $2.91M. HLOSF’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $402.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $101.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $1.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPMV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPMV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HLOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLOSF is a better buy in the long-term than CPMV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPMV’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLOSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPMV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HLOSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLOSF is a better buy in the short-term than CPMV.

Price Growth

CPMV (@Biotechnology) experienced а -25.14% price change this week, while HLOSF (@Biotechnology) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+0.88% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLOSF($402M) has a higher market cap than CPMV($2.91M). HLOSF YTD gains are higher at: 204.444 vs. CPMV (-42.670). CPMV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -729.66K vs. HLOSF (-2.39B). HLOSF has more cash in the bank: 6.25B vs. CPMV (85.9K). CPMV has less debt than HLOSF: CPMV (1.61M) vs HLOSF (2.61B). HLOSF has higher revenues than CPMV: HLOSF (112M) vs CPMV (0).
CPMVHLOSFCPMV / HLOSF
Capitalization2.91M402M1%
EBITDA-729.66K-2.39B0%
Gain YTD-42.670204.444-21%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0112M-
Total Cash85.9K6.25B0%
Total Debt1.61M2.61B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPMV: Fundamental Ratings
CPMV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPMVHLOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPMV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARIIX10.75N/A
N/A
AB Global Real Estate Investment II I
NSGAX23.29N/A
N/A
Columbia Cornerstone Equity A
GLVIX91.53N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Focus R6
JEPCX14.08N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income C
JHFEX13.58N/A
N/A
JHancock Fundamental Equity Inc I

CPMV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPMV and RANI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPMV and RANI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPMV
1D Price
Change %
CPMV100%
N/A
RANI - CPMV
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.23%
AKESF - CPMV
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.39%
PPTDF - CPMV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIGY - CPMV
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLOSF - CPMV
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLOSF and BRTX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLOSF and BRTX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLOSF
1D Price
Change %
HLOSF100%
N/A
BRTX - HLOSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.78%
LGVN - HLOSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.31%
ENTBF - HLOSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPMV - HLOSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLN - HLOSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.39%
More