CPNG
Price
$21.70
Change
-$0.80 (-3.56%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
40.61B
34 days until earnings call
LITB
Price
$2.29
Change
+$0.01 (+0.44%)
Updated
Apr 3, 01:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
41.92M
Ad is loading...

CPNG vs LITB

Header iconCPNG vs LITB Comparison
Open Charts CPNG vs LITBBanner chart's image
Coupang
Price$21.70
Change-$0.80 (-3.56%)
Volume$12.4K
Capitalization40.61B
LightInTheBox Holding
Price$2.29
Change+$0.01 (+0.44%)
Volume$385
Capitalization41.92M
CPNG vs LITB Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPNG vs. LITB commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPNG is a Hold and LITB is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CPNG: $22.49 vs. LITB: $2.28)
Brand notoriety: CPNG and LITB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPNG: 73% vs. LITB: 284%
Market capitalization -- CPNG: $40.61B vs. LITB: $41.92M
CPNG [@Internet Retail] is valued at $40.61B. LITB’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $41.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.08T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $41.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPNG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLITB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPNG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LITB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LITB is a better buy in the long-term than CPNG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPNG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LITB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPNG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LITB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LITB is a better buy in the short-term than CPNG.

Price Growth

CPNG (@Internet Retail) experienced а -4.62% price change this week, while LITB (@Internet Retail) price change was +93.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPNG is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

LITB is expected to report earnings on Aug 02, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-2.52% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPNG($40.6B) has a higher market cap than LITB($41.9M). LITB YTD gains are higher at: 35.714 vs. CPNG (2.320). CPNG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. LITB (-7.21M). CPNG has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. LITB (15M). LITB has less debt than CPNG: LITB (5.06M) vs CPNG (3.73B). CPNG has higher revenues than LITB: CPNG (30.3B) vs LITB (333M).
CPNGLITBCPNG / LITB
Capitalization40.6B41.9M96,897%
EBITDA1.05B-7.21M-14,510%
Gain YTD2.32035.7146%
P/E Ratio281.13N/A-
Revenue30.3B333M9,099%
Total Cash5.88B15M39,193%
Total Debt3.73B5.06M73,631%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LITB: Fundamental Ratings
LITB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPNGLITB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEG214.467.52
+3.63%
Constellation Energy Corp
OTLK1.250.03
+2.46%
Outlook Therapeutics
GEL15.960.15
+0.95%
Genesis Energy LP
SPOK16.58-0.04
-0.24%
Spok Holdings
ELP7.41-0.02
-0.27%
Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL

CPNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPNG has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPNG jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPNG
1D Price
Change %
CPNG100%
+1.40%
CVNA - CPNG
46%
Loosely correlated
+6.46%
MI - CPNG
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.54%
JTKWY - CPNG
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
ZLNDY - CPNG
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.85%
W - CPNG
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.57%
More

LITB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LITB and PDD have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LITB and PDD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITB
1D Price
Change %
LITB100%
+1.33%
PDD - LITB
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
JD - LITB
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
BZUN - LITB
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
CPNG - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
BABA - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
More