CPPCY
Price
$14.35
Change
-$0.92 (-6.02%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.74B
CUYTF
Price
$44.10
Change
-$0.60 (-1.34%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
Capitalization
5.33B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPPCY vs CUYTF

Header iconCPPCY vs CUYTF Comparison
Open Charts CPPCY vs CUYTFBanner chart's image
CP All Public
Price$14.35
Change-$0.92 (-6.02%)
Volume$100
Capitalization12.74B
COLRUYT GROUP
Price$44.10
Change-$0.60 (-1.34%)
Volume$335
Capitalization5.33B
CPPCY vs CUYTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPPCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPPCY vs. CUYTF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPPCY is a Hold and CUYTF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CPPCY: $14.35 vs. CUYTF: $44.10)
Brand notoriety: CPPCY and CUYTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPPCY: 45% vs. CUYTF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CPPCY: $12.74B vs. CUYTF: $5.33B
CPPCY [@Food Retail] is valued at $12.74B. CUYTF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $5.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $49.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPPCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCUYTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPPCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CUYTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CPPCY and CUYTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPPCY’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CPPCY’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CPPCY (@Food Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CUYTF (@Food Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+0.14% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPPCY($12.7B) has a higher market cap than CUYTF($5.33B). CPPCY has higher P/E ratio than CUYTF: CPPCY (15.60) vs CUYTF (14.71). CUYTF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CPPCY (-14.662). CPPCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 90.3B vs. CUYTF (1.63B). CPPCY has higher revenues than CUYTF: CPPCY (970B) vs CUYTF (10.8B).
CPPCYCUYTFCPPCY / CUYTF
Capitalization12.7B5.33B238%
EBITDA90.3B1.63B5,554%
Gain YTD-14.6620.000-
P/E Ratio15.6014.71106%
Revenue970B10.8B8,981%
Total Cash49.2BN/A-
Total Debt420BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPPCY vs CUYTF: Fundamental Ratings
CPPCY
CUYTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4327
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7572
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
886
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPPCY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CUYTF (97). This means that CPPCY’s stock grew significantly faster than CUYTF’s over the last 12 months.

CPPCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CUYTF (100). This means that CPPCY’s stock grew similarly to CUYTF’s over the last 12 months.

CUYTF's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as CPPCY (43). This means that CUYTF’s stock grew similarly to CPPCY’s over the last 12 months.

CUYTF's Price Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CPPCY (75). This means that CUYTF’s stock grew similarly to CPPCY’s over the last 12 months.

CUYTF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPPCY (88). This means that CUYTF’s stock grew significantly faster than CPPCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPPCYCUYTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPPCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASHS32.980.82
+2.54%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 CHN A SmCp ETF
EBUF27.740.02
+0.07%
Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buf ETF-Qt
MLN16.780.01
+0.06%
VanEck Long Muni ETF
JPIE46.31-0.02
-0.03%
JPMorgan Income ETF
OBTC33.27-0.33
-0.98%
Osprey Bitcoin Trust

CPPCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPPCY and ADRNY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPPCY and ADRNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPPCY
1D Price
Change %
CPPCY100%
N/A
ADRNY - CPPCY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUYTF - CPPCY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRRFY - CPPCY
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
CUYTY - CPPCY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRERF - CPPCY
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
More

CUYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUYTF and CVPBF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUYTF and CVPBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUYTF
1D Price
Change %
CUYTF100%
N/A
CVPBF - CUYTF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUYTY - CUYTF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPPCY - CUYTF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADRNY - CUYTF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRRFY - CUYTF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
More