CPS
Price
$38.52
Change
-$0.64 (-1.63%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
690.52M
42 days until earnings call
FOXF
Price
$26.02
Change
-$0.98 (-3.63%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPS vs FOXF

Header iconCPS vs FOXF Comparison
Open Charts CPS vs FOXFBanner chart's image
Cooper-Standard Automotive
Price$38.52
Change-$0.64 (-1.63%)
Volume$231.98K
Capitalization690.52M
Fox Factory Holding
Price$26.02
Change-$0.98 (-3.63%)
Volume$626.84K
Capitalization1.13B
CPS vs FOXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPS vs. FOXF commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPS is a Hold and FOXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CPS: $38.52 vs. FOXF: $26.02)
Brand notoriety: CPS and FOXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPS: 108% vs. FOXF: 105%
Market capitalization -- CPS: $690.52M vs. FOXF: $1.13B
CPS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $690.52M. FOXF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $89.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFOXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FOXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPS is a better buy in the long-term than FOXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FOXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOXF is a better buy in the short-term than CPS.

Price Growth

CPS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.82% price change this week, while FOXF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -7.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPS is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

FOXF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.38% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOXF($1.13B) has a higher market cap than CPS($691M). FOXF has higher P/E ratio than CPS: FOXF (125.88) vs CPS (22.79). CPS YTD gains are higher at: 184.071 vs. FOXF (-14.040). CPS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 219M vs. FOXF (-115.64M). CPS has more cash in the bank: 122M vs. FOXF (81.5M). FOXF has less debt than CPS: FOXF (715M) vs CPS (1.19B). CPS has higher revenues than FOXF: CPS (2.72B) vs FOXF (1.44B).
CPSFOXFCPS / FOXF
Capitalization691M1.13B61%
EBITDA219M-115.64M-189%
Gain YTD184.071-14.040-1,311%
P/E Ratio22.79125.8818%
Revenue2.72B1.44B189%
Total Cash122M81.5M150%
Total Debt1.19B715M167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPS vs FOXF: Fundamental Ratings
CPS
FOXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7653
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
10096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
153
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3124

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPS's Valuation (66) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as FOXF (89) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CPS’s stock grew similarly to FOXF’s over the last 12 months.

CPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOXF (100) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOXF’s over the last 12 months.

FOXF's SMR Rating (96) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CPS (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that FOXF’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

CPS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as FOXF (62) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CPS’s stock grew similarly to FOXF’s over the last 12 months.

FOXF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CPS (15) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that FOXF’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPSFOXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGLAX56.96N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
HCMGX33.36N/A
N/A
HCM Tactical Plus A
FNKCX16.66N/A
N/A
Frank Value C
DCUCX14.60N/A
N/A
DWS CROCI US C
FZFLX4.46N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index

CPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPS has been loosely correlated with AXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPS jumps, then AXL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPS
1D Price
Change %
CPS100%
-1.63%
AXL - CPS
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LIMAF - CPS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
XPEL - CPS
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
PLOW - CPS
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
THRM - CPS
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More

FOXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOXF has been closely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FOXF jumps, then VC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOXF
1D Price
Change %
FOXF100%
-3.63%
VC - FOXF
66%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
BWA - FOXF
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
LEA - FOXF
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
ADNT - FOXF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
THRM - FOXF
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More