CPS
Price
$15.66
Change
+$0.43 (+2.82%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
272.24M
24 days until earnings call
KGAUF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.05 (+45.45%)
Updated
Jan 7 closing price
Capitalization
238.15M
Ad is loading...

CPS vs KGAUF

Header iconCPS vs KGAUF Comparison
Open Charts CPS vs KGAUFBanner chart's image
Cooper-Standard Automotive
Price$15.66
Change+$0.43 (+2.82%)
Volume$175.81K
Capitalization272.24M
Kongsberg Automotive ASA
Price$0.16
Change+$0.05 (+45.45%)
Volume$500
Capitalization238.15M
CPS vs KGAUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPS vs. KGAUF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPS is a Hold and KGAUF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CPS: $15.66 vs. KGAUF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: CPS and KGAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPS: 115% vs. KGAUF: 38%
Market capitalization -- CPS: $272.24M vs. KGAUF: $238.15M
CPS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $272.24M. KGAUF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $238.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKGAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KGAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CPS and KGAUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGAUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KGAUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGAUF is a better buy in the short-term than CPS.

Price Growth

CPS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +18.46% price change this week, while KGAUF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPS is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.51% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPS($272M) has a higher market cap than KGAUF($238M). KGAUF YTD gains are higher at: 40.212 vs. CPS (15.487). CPS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 162M vs. KGAUF (81.9M). KGAUF has more cash in the bank: 179M vs. CPS (155M). KGAUF has less debt than CPS: KGAUF (264M) vs CPS (1.19B). CPS has higher revenues than KGAUF: CPS (2.82B) vs KGAUF (916M).
CPSKGAUFCPS / KGAUF
Capitalization272M238M114%
EBITDA162M81.9M198%
Gain YTD15.48740.21239%
P/E RatioN/A10.00-
Revenue2.82B916M307%
Total Cash155M179M87%
Total Debt1.19B264M451%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPS vs KGAUF: Fundamental Ratings
CPS
KGAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGAUF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CPS (59) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that KGAUF’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

KGAUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CPS (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that KGAUF’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

KGAUF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as CPS (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that KGAUF’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

KGAUF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CPS (43) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that KGAUF’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

KGAUF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as CPS (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that KGAUF’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPSKGAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMS84.321.93
+2.34%
GMS
ATEN18.960.24
+1.28%
A10 Networks
IMMR8.630.08
+0.94%
Immersion Corp
BRO105.55-0.40
-0.38%
Brown & Brown
CSLR1.61-0.04
-2.42%
Complete Solaria