CPS
Price
$32.50
Change
-$0.97 (-2.90%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
590.19M
20 days until earnings call
KGAUF
Price
$0.19
Change
+$0.06 (+46.15%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
146.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPS vs KGAUF

Header iconCPS vs KGAUF Comparison
Open Charts CPS vs KGAUFBanner chart's image
Cooper-Standard Automotive
Price$32.50
Change-$0.97 (-2.90%)
Volume$156.07K
Capitalization590.19M
Kongsberg Automotive ASA
Price$0.19
Change+$0.06 (+46.15%)
Volume$4.2K
Capitalization146.36M
CPS vs KGAUF Comparison Chart in %
CPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPS vs. KGAUF commentary
Oct 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPS is a StrongBuy and KGAUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2025
Stock price -- (CPS: $32.50 vs. KGAUF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: CPS and KGAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPS: 81% vs. KGAUF: 31%
Market capitalization -- CPS: $590.19M vs. KGAUF: $146.36M
CPS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $590.19M. KGAUF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $146.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $84.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKGAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KGAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPS is a better buy in the long-term than KGAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGAUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KGAUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPS is a better buy in the short-term than KGAUF.

Price Growth

CPS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -11.11% price change this week, while KGAUF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPS is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.42% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPS($590M) has a higher market cap than KGAUF($146M). CPS YTD gains are higher at: 139.675 vs. KGAUF (64.709). CPS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 219M vs. KGAUF (20.1M). CPS has more cash in the bank: 122M vs. KGAUF (80.3M). KGAUF has less debt than CPS: KGAUF (199M) vs CPS (1.19B). CPS has higher revenues than KGAUF: CPS (2.72B) vs KGAUF (814M).
CPSKGAUFCPS / KGAUF
Capitalization590M146M404%
EBITDA219M20.1M1,090%
Gain YTD139.67564.709216%
P/E Ratio19.23N/A-
Revenue2.72B814M334%
Total Cash122M80.3M152%
Total Debt1.19B199M599%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPS vs KGAUF: Fundamental Ratings
CPS
KGAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5343
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7197
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2598
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGAUF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CPS (62) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that KGAUF’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

CPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as KGAUF (97) in the null industry. This means that CPS’s stock grew similarly to KGAUF’s over the last 12 months.

KGAUF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CPS (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that KGAUF’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

CPS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as KGAUF (41) in the null industry. This means that CPS’s stock grew similarly to KGAUF’s over the last 12 months.

CPS's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for KGAUF (98) in the null industry. This means that CPS’s stock grew significantly faster than KGAUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPSKGAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFGYF0.13N/A
N/A
AFC Energy Plc.
CRWE1.04N/A
N/A
Crown Equity Holdings, Inc.
DLVHF30.00N/A
N/A
Delivery Hero AG NA
TPRKY8.23-0.02
-0.24%
Travis Perkins Plc
XIACF6.80-0.11
-1.66%
Xiaomi Corp.

CPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPS has been loosely correlated with AXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPS jumps, then AXL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPS
1D Price
Change %
CPS100%
-2.90%
AXL - CPS
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.23%
LIMAF - CPS
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
PLOW - CPS
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
ALSN - CPS
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
LEA - CPS
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
More

KGAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGAUF has been loosely correlated with NTXVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KGAUF jumps, then NTXVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGAUF
1D Price
Change %
KGAUF100%
N/A
NTXVF - KGAUF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CPS - KGAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.90%
NHKGF - KGAUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELLRY - KGAUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMTF - KGAUF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More