CPS
Price
$22.13
Change
-$1.50 (-6.35%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
272.24M
70 days until earnings call
LEA
Price
$91.14
Change
-$2.80 (-2.98%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
8.26B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPS vs LEA

Header iconCPS vs LEA Comparison
Open Charts CPS vs LEABanner chart's image
Cooper-Standard Automotive
Price$22.13
Change-$1.50 (-6.35%)
Volume$483.51K
Capitalization272.24M
Lear
Price$91.14
Change-$2.80 (-2.98%)
Volume$548.09K
Capitalization8.26B
CPS vs LEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPS vs. LEA commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPS is a Buy and LEA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CPS: $22.13 vs. LEA: $91.14)
Brand notoriety: CPS and LEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPS: 105% vs. LEA: 75%
Market capitalization -- CPS: $272.24M vs. LEA: $8.26B
CPS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $272.24M. LEA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $8.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CPS and LEA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LEA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the short-term than CPS.

Price Growth

CPS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -10.73% price change this week, while LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -3.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

LEA is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.49% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEA($8.26B) has a higher market cap than CPS($272M). CPS YTD gains are higher at: 63.201 vs. LEA (-2.965). LEA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. CPS (162M). LEA has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. CPS (155M). CPS has less debt than LEA: CPS (1.19B) vs LEA (2.92B). LEA has higher revenues than CPS: LEA (23.5B) vs CPS (2.82B).
CPSLEACPS / LEA
Capitalization272M8.26B3%
EBITDA162M1.48B11%
Gain YTD63.201-2.965-2,131%
P/E RatioN/A14.91-
Revenue2.82B23.5B12%
Total Cash155M1.2B13%
Total Debt1.19B2.92B41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPS vs LEA: Fundamental Ratings
CPS
LEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2212
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7594
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10076
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEA's Valuation (15) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPS (56). This means that LEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPS’s over the last 12 months.

CPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (94). This means that CPS’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

CPS's SMR Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (100). This means that CPS’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

CPS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (51). This means that CPS’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CPS (100). This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPSLEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGP101.451.48
+1.48%
DB Gold Double Long ETN
DBA27.680.03
+0.11%
Invesco DB Agriculture
BBIB97.37-0.36
-0.37%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S.TrsBd3-10YrETF
DUHP33.92-0.62
-1.80%
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
CSB54.71-1.56
-2.77%
VictoryShares US SmCp Hi Div Vol Wtd ETF

CPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPS has been loosely correlated with AXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPS jumps, then AXL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPS
1D Price
Change %
CPS100%
-6.35%
AXL - CPS
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.16%
LEA - CPS
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
VC - CPS
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
FOXF - CPS
47%
Loosely correlated
-4.67%
BWA - CPS
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
More

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with DAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then DAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
-2.98%
DAN - LEA
82%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
MGA - LEA
79%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
ADNT - LEA
79%
Closely correlated
-3.81%
BWA - LEA
78%
Closely correlated
-1.80%
VC - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
More