CPS
Price
$13.96
Change
-$0.99 (-6.62%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
272.24M
27 days until earnings call
LEA
Price
$82.31
Change
-$6.45 (-7.27%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.26B
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CPS vs LEA

Header iconCPS vs LEA Comparison
Open Charts CPS vs LEABanner chart's image
Cooper-Standard Automotive
Price$13.96
Change-$0.99 (-6.62%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization272.24M
Lear
Price$82.31
Change-$6.45 (-7.27%)
Volume$5.14K
Capitalization8.26B
CPS vs LEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPS vs. LEA commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPS is a Buy and LEA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CPS: $13.97 vs. LEA: $82.34)
Brand notoriety: CPS and LEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPS: 155% vs. LEA: 110%
Market capitalization -- CPS: $272.24M vs. LEA: $8.26B
CPS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $272.24M. LEA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $8.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the long-term than CPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LEA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPS is a better buy in the short-term than LEA.

Price Growth

CPS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -12.91% price change this week, while LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -7.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -6.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPS is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

LEA is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-6.42% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEA($8.26B) has a higher market cap than CPS($272M). CPS YTD gains are higher at: 10.251 vs. LEA (-12.334). LEA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. CPS (162M). LEA has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. CPS (155M). CPS has less debt than LEA: CPS (1.19B) vs LEA (2.92B). LEA has higher revenues than CPS: LEA (23.5B) vs CPS (2.82B).
CPSLEACPS / LEA
Capitalization272M8.26B3%
EBITDA162M1.48B11%
Gain YTD10.251-12.334-83%
P/E RatioN/A14.91-
Revenue2.82B23.5B12%
Total Cash155M1.2B13%
Total Debt1.19B2.92B41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPS vs LEA: Fundamental Ratings
CPS
LEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6567
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9692
SMR RATING
1..100
10066
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4777
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9986
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEA's Valuation (16) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPS (67). This means that LEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPS’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CPS (96). This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's SMR Rating (66) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPS (100). This means that LEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPS’s over the last 12 months.

CPS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (77). This means that CPS’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CPS (99). This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPSLEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGP91.570.77
+0.85%
DB Gold Double Long ETN
CATH68.220.42
+0.62%
Global X S&P 500® Catholic Values ETF
MUSQ24.790.14
+0.58%
MUSQ Global Music Industry Idx ETF
FVD44.780.20
+0.45%
First Trust Value Line® Dividend ETF
ERC9.260.04
+0.38%
Allspring Multi-Sector Income Fund

CPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPS has been loosely correlated with MGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPS jumps, then MGA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPS
1D Price
Change %
CPS100%
-1.52%
MGA - CPS
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
VC - CPS
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
FOXF - CPS
47%
Loosely correlated
+6.06%
LEA - CPS
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
DORM - CPS
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
More

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with DAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then DAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
-7.23%
DAN - LEA
82%
Closely correlated
-9.06%
VC - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
-5.27%
MGA - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
-4.17%
BWA - LEA
73%
Closely correlated
-6.56%
ADNT - LEA
68%
Closely correlated
-6.63%
More