Advertisement
CPSH vs LYTS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPSH is a Hold and LYTS is a Hold.
| CPSH | LYTS | CPSH / LYTS | |
| Capitalization | 77.9M | 758M | 10% |
| EBITDA | -16.12K | 54M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 30.097 | 11.850 | 254% |
| P/E Ratio | 402.00 | 30.37 | 1,324% |
| Revenue | 32.3M | 689M | 5% |
| Total Cash | 19.2M | 14.2M | 135% |
| Total Debt | 264K | 307M | 0% |
CPSH | LYTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 43 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LYTS's Valuation (36) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPSH (92) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LYTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPSH’s over the last 12 months.
LYTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPSH (100) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LYTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPSH’s over the last 12 months.
LYTS's SMR Rating (77) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CPSH (90) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LYTS’s stock grew similarly to CPSH’s over the last 12 months.
CPSH's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as LYTS (63) in the Building Products industry. This means that CPSH’s stock grew similarly to LYTS’s over the last 12 months.
CPSH's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as LYTS (35) in the Building Products industry. This means that CPSH’s stock grew similarly to LYTS’s over the last 12 months.
| CPSH | LYTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 21 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 68% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while LYTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CPSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LYTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYTS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LYTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CPSH (@Electronic Components) experienced а -1.47% price change this week, while LYTS (@Electronic Components) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
CPSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
LYTS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-1.37% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TDWRX | 34.40 | 0.40 | +1.18% |
| Thornburg Developing World R6 | |||
| IBNCX | 26.29 | 0.07 | +0.27% |
| Nomura Balanced Fund Class C | |||
| FGSKX | 56.49 | 0.05 | +0.09% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6 | |||
| FSMBX | 17.48 | -0.05 | -0.29% |
| Tributary Small/Mid Cap Instl Plus | |||
| LSIUX | 15.58 | -0.17 | -1.08% |
| ClearBridge International Value IS | |||
LYTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYTS has been loosely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LYTS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYTS | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| KN - LYTS | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| ROG - LYTS | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| PLXS - LYTS | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| TEL - LYTS | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| ALNT - LYTS | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
More | ||||