CPXGF vs MSGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPXGF is a Hold and MSGS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPXGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CPXGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MSGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPXGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPXGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MSGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CPXGF (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а -2.75% price change this week, while MSGS (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was -6.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
MSGS is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Movies/Entertainment (+0.86% weekly)Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.
| CPXGF | MSGS | CPXGF / MSGS | |
| Capitalization | 440M | 4.42B | 10% |
| EBITDA | 353M | 105M | 336% |
| Gain YTD | 35.807 | 21.163 | 169% |
| P/E Ratio | 48.54 | 115.48 | 42% |
| Revenue | 1.38B | 880M | 157% |
| Total Cash | 19.7M | 37.9M | 52% |
| Total Debt | 1.94B | 1.15B | 168% |
CPXGF | MSGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MSGS's Valuation (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CPXGF (92). This means that MSGS’s stock grew similarly to CPXGF’s over the last 12 months.
MSGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPXGF (100). This means that MSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPXGF’s over the last 12 months.
MSGS's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CPXGF (100). This means that MSGS’s stock grew similarly to CPXGF’s over the last 12 months.
CPXGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MSGS (45). This means that CPXGF’s stock grew similarly to MSGS’s over the last 12 months.
CPXGF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSGS (92). This means that CPXGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MSGS’s over the last 12 months.
| CPXGF | MSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 68% | 9 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 58% |
CPXGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPXGF and NWSA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPXGF and NWSA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPXGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPXGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NWSA - CPXGF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| NWS - CPXGF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| MSGS - CPXGF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
| BATRA - CPXGF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| FOX - CPXGF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||
MSGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSGS has been loosely correlated with LYV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSGS jumps, then LYV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSGS | 100% | -2.24% | ||
| LYV - MSGS | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| LLYVK - MSGS | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| BATRA - MSGS | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| BATRK - MSGS | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| LLYVA - MSGS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
More | ||||