CPXWF
Price
$34.59
Change
+$1.23 (+3.69%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.68B
FTS
Price
$47.39
Change
+$1.23 (+2.66%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.48B
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CPXWF vs FTS

Header iconCPXWF vs FTS Comparison
Open Charts CPXWF vs FTSBanner chart's image
Capital Power
Price$34.59
Change+$1.23 (+3.69%)
Volume$101.36K
Capitalization3.68B
Fortis
Price$47.39
Change+$1.23 (+2.66%)
Volume$100
Capitalization19.48B
CPXWF vs FTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPXWF vs. FTS commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPXWF is a Hold and FTS is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CPXWF: $34.59 vs. FTS: $46.16)
Brand notoriety: CPXWF and FTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPXWF: 2% vs. FTS: 35%
Market capitalization -- CPXWF: $3.68B vs. FTS: $19.48B
CPXWF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $3.68B. FTS’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $19.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPXWF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPXWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPXWF is a better buy in the long-term than FTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CPXWF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +0.38% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was +3.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+1.29% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTS($19.5B) has a higher market cap than CPXWF($3.68B). CPXWF has higher P/E ratio than FTS: CPXWF (18.45) vs FTS (17.13). FTS YTD gains are higher at: 11.042 vs. CPXWF (-22.374). FTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.15B vs. CPXWF (1.06B). FTS has more cash in the bank: 625M vs. CPXWF (245M). CPXWF has less debt than FTS: CPXWF (3.62B) vs FTS (30B). FTS has higher revenues than CPXWF: FTS (11.5B) vs CPXWF (3.57B).
CPXWFFTSCPXWF / FTS
Capitalization3.68B19.5B19%
EBITDA1.06B5.15B21%
Gain YTD-22.37411.042-203%
P/E Ratio18.4517.13108%
Revenue3.57B11.5B31%
Total Cash245M625M39%
Total Debt3.62B30B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPXWF vs FTS: Fundamental Ratings
CPXWF
FTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9225
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5266
SMR RATING
1..100
4678
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1329
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a31

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPXWF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (57). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (66). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (78). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CPXWF (61). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to CPXWF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (29). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGRIX61.88N/A
N/A
Fidelity Growth & Income
FMFAX84.91N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Materials A
BCSFX23.98N/A
N/A
Brown Capital Mgmt Intl Sm Co Instl
GURAX31.92N/A
N/A
NAA Risk Managed Real Estate A
GCSVX9.87N/A
N/A
Geneva SMID Cap Growth Institutional

CPXWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPXWF has been loosely correlated with TAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPXWF jumps, then TAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPXWF
1D Price
Change %
CPXWF100%
+3.69%
TAC - CPXWF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
ACLLF - CPXWF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
BIP - CPXWF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
NWE - CPXWF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
FTS - CPXWF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
More

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been loosely correlated with ACLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then ACLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
+0.09%
ACLLF - FTS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
EVRG - FTS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
BKH - FTS
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
WEC - FTS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
DTE - FTS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More