Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPZ vs FFLS
CPZ vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPZ vs. FFLS commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPZ is a Hold and FFLS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPZ has more net assets: 351M vs. FFLS (41.5M). CPZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CPZ (15.982) vs FFLS (11.338). CPZ was incepted earlier than FFLS: CPZ (6 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CPZ (1.85). CPZ has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| CPZ | FFLS | CPZ / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 15.982 | 11.338 | 141% |
| Net Assets | 351M | 41.5M | 846% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.24 | 149% |
| Turnover | 249.00 | 88.00 | 283% |
| Yield | 2.54 | 0.16 | 1,613% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CPZ | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPZ and CSX have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPZ and CSX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPZ | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| CSX - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| DAL - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
| LHX - CPZ | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.34% | ||
| MSFT - CPZ | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| ORCL - CPZ | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| GTLS - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||