Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPZ vs FFLS
CPZ vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPZ vs. FFLS commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPZ is a Hold and FFLS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPZ has more net assets: 346M vs. FFLS (41.1M). CPZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CPZ (17.823) vs FFLS (10.295). CPZ was incepted earlier than FFLS: CPZ (6 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CPZ (1.85). CPZ has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| CPZ | FFLS | CPZ / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 17.823 | 10.295 | 173% |
| Net Assets | 346M | 41.1M | 842% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.24 | 149% |
| Turnover | 249.00 | 88.00 | 283% |
| Yield | 2.30 | 0.16 | 1,476% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CPZ | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPZ and CSX have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPZ and CSX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPZ | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| CSX - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| DAL - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.05% | ||
| LHX - CPZ | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
| MSFT - CPZ | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| ORCL - CPZ | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| META - FFLS | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||