Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPZ vs FFLS
CPZ vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPZ vs. FFLS commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPZ is a Hold and FFLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPZ has more net assets: 346M vs. FFLS (40.5M). CPZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CPZ (19.545) vs FFLS (11.599). CPZ was incepted earlier than FFLS: CPZ (6 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CPZ (1.85). CPZ has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| CPZ | FFLS | CPZ / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 19.545 | 11.599 | 169% |
| Net Assets | 346M | 40.5M | 854% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.24 | 149% |
| Turnover | 249.00 | 88.00 | 283% |
| Yield | 2.02 | 0.16 | 1,296% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CPZ | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 14 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ARYVX | 13.84 | -0.03 | -0.22% |
| American Century Global Real Estate Inv | |||
| TEFTX | 9.23 | -0.03 | -0.32% |
| Templeton Foreign C | |||
| MFVSX | 10.01 | -0.05 | -0.48% |
| MassMutual Equity Opports R5 | |||
| LFFLX | 15.53 | -0.10 | -0.64% |
| Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F | |||
| TRMIX | 33.21 | -0.31 | -0.92% |
| T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value I | |||
CPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPZ and CSX have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPZ and CSX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPZ | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| CSX - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| DAL - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| LHX - CPZ | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| MSFT - CPZ | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
| ORCL - CPZ | 3% Poorly correlated | -5.09% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| META - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||