It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CQP’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileGLP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CQP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while GLP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -6.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.42%.
CQP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
GLP is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
CQP | GLP | CQP / GLP | |
Capitalization | 25.8B | 1.56B | 1,654% |
EBITDA | 3.91B | 401M | 975% |
Gain YTD | 4.713 | 3.279 | 144% |
P/E Ratio | 12.97 | 17.70 | 73% |
Revenue | 9.96B | 17.8B | 56% |
Total Cash | 108M | 16.1M | 671% |
Total Debt | 14.8B | 2.01B | 738% |
CQP | GLP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GLP's Valuation (15) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CQP (34) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.
GLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CQP (22) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's SMR Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLP (61) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (63) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (42) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP | GLP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 4 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago60% | 4 days ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 4 days ago48% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago54% | 4 days ago51% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago63% | 28 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago56% | 4 days ago50% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | 4 days ago62% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
QLTY | 37.06 | 0.20 | +0.54% |
GMO U.S. Quality ETF | |||
GLCR | 26.05 | N/A | N/A |
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF | |||
GSIG | 47.72 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
Goldman Sachs Acs Inv Gd Cp 1-5Yr Bd ETF | |||
PTH | 44.72 | -0.05 | -0.11% |
Invesco Dorsey Wright Healthcare MomtETF | |||
IBTO | 24.56 | -0.07 | -0.28% |
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Trsy ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been closely correlated with LNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then LNG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CQP | 100% | -0.86% | ||
LNG - CQP | 68% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
GLP - CQP | 67% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
OKE - CQP | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
HESM - CQP | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
MPLX - CQP | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
More |