CQP
Price
$58.62
Change
-$5.61 (-8.73%)
Updated
Apr 4, 02:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.91B
27 days until earnings call
GLP
Price
$49.77
Change
-$5.59 (-10.10%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.53B
28 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CQP vs GLP

Header iconCQP vs GLP Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs GLPBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$58.62
Change-$5.61 (-8.73%)
Volume$106
Capitalization23.91B
Global Partners
Price$49.77
Change-$5.59 (-10.10%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.53B
CQP vs GLP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. GLP commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a Hold and GLP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CQP: $64.23 vs. GLP: $55.37)
Brand notoriety: CQP and GLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 96% vs. GLP: 33%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $23.91B vs. GLP: $1.53B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $23.91B. GLP’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLP is a better buy in the long-term than CQP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLP is a better buy in the short-term than CQP.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.85% price change this week, while GLP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +2.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -8.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

GLP is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-8.55% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQP($23.9B) has a higher market cap than GLP($1.53B). GLP has higher P/E ratio than CQP: GLP (12.02) vs CQP (7.11). CQP YTD gains are higher at: 22.531 vs. GLP (20.483). CQP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.75B vs. GLP (356M). CQP has more cash in the bank: 575M vs. GLP (19.6M). GLP has less debt than CQP: GLP (1.54B) vs CQP (16B). GLP has higher revenues than CQP: GLP (16.5B) vs CQP (9.66B).
CQPGLPCQP / GLP
Capitalization23.9B1.53B1,560%
EBITDA5.75B356M1,615%
Gain YTD22.53120.483110%
P/E Ratio7.1112.0259%
Revenue9.66B16.5B59%
Total Cash575M19.6M2,934%
Total Debt16B1.54B1,040%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs GLP: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
GLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2278
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
1165
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLP's Valuation (47) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CQP (84) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CQP’s over the last 12 months.

GLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CQP (7) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLP (65) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (42) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (7) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPGLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWCUX84.14N/A
N/A
American Century Ultra® Inv
MSALX22.60N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Intl Advtg L
IMACX9.39N/A
N/A
Macquarie Multi-Asset Income C
TACLX19.85N/A
N/A
Touchstone Large Cap A
BUIIX21.77N/A
N/A
Buffalo International Institutional

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with MPLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then MPLX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
-5.53%
MPLX - CQP
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
LNG - CQP
51%
Loosely correlated
-6.20%
WES - CQP
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.39%
GLP - CQP
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
HESM - CQP
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.13%
More