CQP
Price
$53.37
Change
-$0.39 (-0.73%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.8B
23 days until earnings call
GLP
Price
$46.03
Change
-$0.42 (-0.90%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.56B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP vs GLP

Header iconCQP vs GLP Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs GLPBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$53.37
Change-$0.39 (-0.73%)
Volume$400
Capitalization25.8B
Global Partners
Price$46.03
Change-$0.42 (-0.90%)
Volume$59.96K
Capitalization1.56B
CQP vs GLP Comparison Chart in %
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. GLP commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a StrongBuy and GLP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CQP: $53.30 vs. GLP: $46.03)
Brand notoriety: CQP and GLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 66% vs. GLP: 83%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $25.8B vs. GLP: $1.56B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $25.8B. GLP’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $108.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileGLP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • GLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the long-term than GLP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the short-term than GLP.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while GLP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -6.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

GLP is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.93% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQP($25.8B) has a higher market cap than GLP($1.56B). GLP has higher P/E ratio than CQP: GLP (17.70) vs CQP (12.97). CQP YTD gains are higher at: 4.713 vs. GLP (3.279). CQP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.91B vs. GLP (401M). CQP has more cash in the bank: 108M vs. GLP (16.1M). GLP has less debt than CQP: GLP (2.01B) vs CQP (14.8B). GLP has higher revenues than CQP: GLP (17.8B) vs CQP (9.96B).
CQPGLPCQP / GLP
Capitalization25.8B1.56B1,654%
EBITDA3.91B401M975%
Gain YTD4.7133.279144%
P/E Ratio12.9717.7073%
Revenue9.96B17.8B56%
Total Cash108M16.1M671%
Total Debt14.8B2.01B738%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs GLP: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
GLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2158
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2213
SMR RATING
1..100
1061
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5863
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2542
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLP's Valuation (15) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CQP (34) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

GLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CQP (22) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLP (61) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (63) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (42) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPGLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QLTY37.060.20
+0.54%
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
GLCR26.05N/A
N/A
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF
GSIG47.72-0.02
-0.04%
Goldman Sachs Acs Inv Gd Cp 1-5Yr Bd ETF
PTH44.72-0.05
-0.11%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Healthcare MomtETF
IBTO24.56-0.07
-0.28%
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Trsy ETF

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been closely correlated with LNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then LNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
-0.86%
LNG - CQP
68%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
GLP - CQP
67%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
OKE - CQP
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
HESM - CQP
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.20%
MPLX - CQP
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
More