CQP
Price
$55.82
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
23.91B
27 days until earnings call
GLP
Price
$52.67
Change
+$0.26 (+0.50%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP vs GLP

Header iconCQP vs GLP Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs GLPBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$55.82
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.13K
Capitalization23.91B
Global Partners
Price$52.67
Change+$0.26 (+0.50%)
Volume$7.45K
Capitalization1.53B
CQP vs GLP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. GLP commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a StrongBuy and GLP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CQP: $56.13 vs. GLP: $52.67)
Brand notoriety: CQP and GLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 32% vs. GLP: 12%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $23.91B vs. GLP: $1.53B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $23.91B. GLP’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GLP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the long-term than GLP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLP is a better buy in the short-term than CQP.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.51% price change this week, while GLP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

GLP is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-1.07% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQP($23.9B) has a higher market cap than GLP($1.53B). GLP has higher P/E ratio than CQP: GLP (12.02) vs CQP (7.11). GLP YTD gains are higher at: 16.413 vs. CQP (8.641). CQP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.75B vs. GLP (356M). CQP has more cash in the bank: 575M vs. GLP (19.6M). GLP has less debt than CQP: GLP (1.54B) vs CQP (16B). GLP has higher revenues than CQP: GLP (16.5B) vs CQP (9.66B).
CQPGLPCQP / GLP
Capitalization23.9B1.53B1,560%
EBITDA5.75B356M1,615%
Gain YTD8.64116.41353%
P/E Ratio7.1112.0259%
Revenue9.66B16.5B59%
Total Cash575M19.6M2,934%
Total Debt16B1.54B1,040%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs GLP: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
GLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5662
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
218
SMR RATING
1..100
1154
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2759
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLP's Valuation (34) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CQP (82) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CQP’s over the last 12 months.

GLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CQP (21) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLP (54) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLP’s over the last 12 months.

GLP's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CQP (60) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (59) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPGLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMVAX15.91N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value I
VUIAX88.09N/A
N/A
Vanguard Utilities Index Adm
BAFHX18.02N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory WMC Strat Eurp Eq Instl
HDRVX18.23N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson International Div N
PIPTX17.37N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend I

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with MPLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then MPLX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
+0.56%
MPLX - CQP
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
GLP - CQP
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
LNG - CQP
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
HESM - CQP
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
EPD - CQP
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
More

GLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLP has been loosely correlated with CQP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLP jumps, then CQP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLP
1D Price
Change %
GLP100%
+0.50%
CQP - GLP
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
MPLX - GLP
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
EPD - GLP
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
WMB - GLP
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
ET - GLP
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
More