CQP
Price
$57.48
Change
+$0.46 (+0.81%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
23.91B
81 days until earnings call
TRGP
Price
$159.56
Change
-$0.49 (-0.31%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
24.92B
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CQP vs TRGP

Header iconCQP vs TRGP Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs TRGPBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$57.48
Change+$0.46 (+0.81%)
Volume$203.02K
Capitalization23.91B
Targa Resources
Price$159.56
Change-$0.49 (-0.31%)
Volume$1.65M
Capitalization24.92B
CQP vs TRGP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. TRGP commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a Buy and TRGP is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CQP: $57.48 vs. TRGP: $159.56)
Brand notoriety: CQP: Not notable vs. TRGP: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 119% vs. TRGP: 71%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $23.91B vs. TRGP: $24.92B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $23.91B. TRGP’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $24.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRGP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRGP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRGP is a better buy in the long-term than CQP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TRGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRGP is a better buy in the short-term than CQP.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -3.89% price change this week, while TRGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

TRGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.83% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRGP($24.9B) and CQP($23.9B) have the same market capitalization . TRGP has higher P/E ratio than CQP: TRGP (30.66) vs CQP (7.11). CQP YTD gains are higher at: 11.254 vs. TRGP (-9.776). CQP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.75B vs. TRGP (3.96B). CQP has more cash in the bank: 575M vs. TRGP (142M). TRGP has less debt than CQP: TRGP (13B) vs CQP (16B). TRGP has higher revenues than CQP: TRGP (16.1B) vs CQP (9.66B).
CQPTRGPCQP / TRGP
Capitalization23.9B24.9B96%
EBITDA5.75B3.96B145%
Gain YTD11.254-9.776-115%
P/E Ratio7.1130.6623%
Revenue9.66B16.1B60%
Total Cash575M142M405%
Total Debt16B13B123%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs TRGP: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
TRGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6371
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1110
SMR RATING
1..100
9821
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1822
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRGP's Valuation (80) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as CQP (83) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

TRGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as CQP (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

TRGP's SMR Rating (21) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is significantly better than the same rating for CQP (98) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP’s stock grew significantly faster than CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as TRGP (57) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to TRGP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as TRGP (22) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to TRGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPTRGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPSN6.770.18
+2.73%
Epsilon Energy Ltd
SILO0.81N/A
N/A
Silo Pharma
DINO34.11-0.01
-0.03%
HF Sinclair Corp
CSTL16.78-0.42
-2.47%
Castle Biosciences
SLVM52.64-7.56
-12.56%
Sylvamo Corp

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with MPLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then MPLX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
+2.28%
MPLX - CQP
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
ET - CQP
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
GLP - CQP
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
HESM - CQP
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
LNG - CQP
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
More

TRGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRGP has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRGP jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRGP
1D Price
Change %
TRGP100%
-0.31%
OKE - TRGP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
KNTK - TRGP
82%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
WMB - TRGP
79%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
KMI - TRGP
77%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
ET - TRGP
77%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
More